Listening to the Giants

                                            L imited Atonement   Definition: Christ’s death actually paid for the sins of those whom He knew would ultimately be saved (i.e. the elect) Did John Calvin teach this doctrine? Yeah…I don’t know about this one. Here are a couple excerpts from his commentaries:  Commentary on Romans 5:18 "Paul makes grace common to all men, not because it in fact extends to all, but because it is offered to all. Although Christ suffered for the sins of the world, and is offered by the goodness of God without distinction to all men, yet not all receive him."   Commentary on I Timothy 2:5 "This clause is of a similar import with the former; for, as there is one God, the Creator and Father of all, so he says that there is but one Mediator, through whom we have access to the Father; and that this Mediator was given, not only to one nation, or to a small number of persons of some particular rank, but to all;  because

                                                                 U nconditional Election Definition: God does not base His election on anything He sees in the individual. He chooses the elect according to the kind intention of His will (Eph. 1:4-8; Rom. 9:11) without any consideration of merit within the individual. Did John Calvin teach this doctrine? Ummm…yeah, definitely. Calvin asserts, “Do they ask how it happens that of two men indistinguishable in merit, God in his election passes over one but takes the other? I, in turn, ask: “Do they think that there is anything in him who is taken that disposes God to him?” If they admit that there is nothing, as they must, it will follow that God does not consider the man but seeks from His own goodness the reason to do him good. The fact that God therefore chooses one man but rejects another arises not out of regard to the man but solely from His mercy, which ought to be free to manifest and express itself where an

Many individuals (both Christian and non-Christian) connect John Calvin (or his followers) to the invention of the acronym TULIP. Yet the truth is its origin should be placed on the followers of Jacob Arminius, who presented the five Remonstrances (which were constructed to oppose the teachings of Calvin’s followers and the Dutch church), at the Synod of Dort in 1618-1619 (roughly 8-9 years after Jacob Arminius died and 54 years after Calvin died). Then, because of the challenge of the followers of Arminius, the followers of Calvin responded to their “five points”, which began the “germinating process” (pun intended) of the infamous TULIP. If this is true, then when and where did the actual acronym TULIP originate? It is hard to say. Richard A. Muller states, “As far as we know, both the acrostic and the associated usage of “five points of Calvinism” are of Anglo-American origin and do not date back before the nineteenth century . It is remarkable how quickly

One of the reasons I love to read biographies is the joy of finding new information. The new information about John Calvin is that he really cared about Christian unity.  Here is a quote from Calvin’s latest biographer:  “It had been an extraordinary gamble to come to Zurich, and Calvin had risked humiliation in his bid to succeed where Bucer and others had failed. He wanted to move the Swiss, and in particular Zurich, out of their isolation and make them part of the wider Reformation movement. The only way to bring this about, he had recognized, was to be flexible for the sake of unity. What the events of the 1540’s clearly demonstrate is that Calvin never regarded his theological formations as non-negotiable.” It is shocking to see the words Calvin, flexible and unity in the same sentence. I probably need to back up and set the context of why Calvin was travelling to Zurich. The Protestant Reformation had central areas of influence. Zwingli and Bullinger were bas