tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-55549289808685075902024-03-13T04:56:07.274-07:00Listening to the GiantsThis blog exists to encourage readers to revisit and learn from the "men of old".Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.comBlogger96125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-18125764016537549922013-01-06T20:25:00.001-08:002013-02-20T22:05:23.892-08:00Phasing out....it was a good run....Well, as the saying goes, all good things must come to an end. This blog, <span style="font-size: large;"><b>Listening to the Giants</b></span>, was a joy and a great first blog to "cut my teeth on", but it is time to shut it down and move forward. <br />
<br />
Now a couple housekeeping items.<br />
<br />
First, the concept and focus of examining the Giants <span style="font-size: large;"><b>will continue on in my new blog, </b></span><span style="font-size: x-large;"><a href="http://pastpresentblog.com/">http://pastpresentblog.com/</a> .</span> I am presently beginning John Knox and I am excited about the weeks ahead.<br />
<br />
Second, the added content will focus around "thoughtful engagement of today's culture" (hence, the <i>present</i> part of the blog title). I found myself wanted to comment on the issues of the day, but felt locked in to sticking to the focus of this blog, which was the "men of old".<br />
<br />
Finally, I want those who read and followed my blog to stay with me. I am committed to continuing to write at a higher literary level and maybe encourage us on our journey towards the Celestial City.<br />
<br />
So again, this blog, <b><span style="font-size: large;">Listening to the Giants</span></b>, will soon phase out....but it is being replaced with something, in my opinion, that will be better and more comprehensive.<br />
<br />
Here is the link again:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://pastpresentblog.com/"><span style="font-size: x-large;">http://pastpresentblog.com/</span></a><br />
<br />Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-27860668528690241022013-01-01T16:02:00.000-08:002013-01-01T16:02:59.794-08:00Book Review: The One Year Father –Daughter Devotions<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinmKFRV-ygonIOUTf71qrp8W-HybIMaApYbG7eGYvdlBdxbfkgVmmdzuHz3s6gTLuOqdt-I-qpcPvs-H_CRJ0loP64rUdF7ZuhnsSTZv4kC_WtT5stX9AX1mNs-4JVpaCRtGzlChLo5n3P/s1600/Father+Daughter+devotions.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinmKFRV-ygonIOUTf71qrp8W-HybIMaApYbG7eGYvdlBdxbfkgVmmdzuHz3s6gTLuOqdt-I-qpcPvs-H_CRJ0loP64rUdF7ZuhnsSTZv4kC_WtT5stX9AX1mNs-4JVpaCRtGzlChLo5n3P/s320/Father+Daughter+devotions.jpg" width="212" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
This reviewer has been a dad for 12 years now and yet I have
consistently struggled in finding the right time, place and devotional content for
my daughters (ages: 12, 9). This is the primary reason why I took the
opportunity to review, <i>The One Year
Father –Daughter Devotions</i>.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>The Good</b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Each day begins with a title and 2-3 paragraphs of interesting
facts and/or appealing anecdotes, which relates to the verse of the day. The author’s
uses of entertaining and original facts are vital to grabbing the daily interest
of the female progeny. Surprisingly, the authors never reveal the intended ages
of their audience, but I would assert daughters from the ages of 6-12 would
find it relevant. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Another element is the use of creative, hands-on ideas in
the section called <i>Daddy-Daughter Time</i>.
This part of the devotional is normally used for applicational questions, but
frequently the authors used it to conduct science experiments (April 29<sup>th</sup>),
culinary moments (Feb. 27<sup>th</sup>) or encourage a movie night (March 29<sup>th</sup>).
Their fresh approach to application is helpful, especially for dads like me who
lack a creative gene. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Finally, this book provides two appendixes in the final
pages of the devotional. In appendix #1, the authors do a sufficient job
offering movie suggestions and also correlating discussion questions that can
infuse a spiritual element in a mundane activity. Appendix #2 offers not only innovative
ideas for “daddy-daughter” dates, but gives 14 reasons why fathers should make “dating”
their daughters a priority. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>The Bad</b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
There is no doubt the authors build their devotional
foundation on a daily verse or verses, but I was confused why the verse itself
was located at the bottom of the page under the title <b><i>What’s the Word?</i></b><i> </i>Most fathers will naturally begin reading
at the top and then work their way to the bottom of the page. Therefore, this
organizational pattern prevents the listening audience to hear or meditate on
the verse until the end of the devotional, which is counter-intuitive, in my
opinion. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The other disappointing aspect is the author’s occasional laxity
in the area of hermeneutics. The title of July 23<sup>rd</sup> is <i>Treating Precious Things Well</i> and the
text is Matthew 7:6, “Don’t waste what is holy on people who are unholy. Don’t throw
your pearls to pigs! They will trample the pearls, then turn and attack you.”
Regarding the interpretation of the text, the author states, </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Jesus is mainly talking about holy teachings that the world
often doesn’t understand. <b><i><u>But you could also take it to mean</u></i></b><u>
</u>not to share the treasures God gives you—including your body—with those who
would only abuse them.” </blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Here the author clearly blurs the difference between interpretation
and application and therefore, violates the timeless hermeneutical maxim, “One
interpretation, many applications”. In my opinion, the author seems to be
forcing an interpretation upon the text that is unwarranted, instead of simply
placing it in the category of application. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The second example of this interpretative looseness in found
on August 28<sup>th</sup>. The text is Genesis 37:5, “One night Joseph had a
dream, and when he told his brothers about it, they hated him more than ever.” The
author uses Martin Luther King as a contemporary example of someone who “had a
dream” and God blessed this dream. The author concludes, </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Indeed, even the noblest dreams will face challenges. But
God wants you to dream big anyways, knowing that if He is the author of your
dreams, no force on earth can keep them from coming true.” </blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
There are three problems here: 1) The author gives no
scriptural evidence that God still speaks through dreams today; 2) the author
gives no advice on how to discern if God is the author of the dream and 3) the
author employs a proof text that gives no proof. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b>Conclusion</b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
This One Year Father-Daughter devotional is to be applauded
for its desire to encourage dads to lead their daughters, specifically exposing
them to the truthfulness and authority of God’s word. Though this reviewer
prefers a more robust and scripturally-precise devotional, I appreciate the author’s
desire to meet “fathers where they are” in their journey to spiritual leadership.
My advice: Fathers, if you are going to use this devotional, make sure you
explore the text yourself. Use it as a reference point, not a crutch. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-17904919836693573712012-12-31T18:45:00.000-08:002012-12-31T18:56:44.574-08:00Book Review: The Decalogue through the Centuries<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjYPO_kMB_9AOmPZdYdt0kYda_sHcn7vmgb8WXWOrdc0_dKDjwOCIr_uzdp2XqW-9Lvu8BtAcTG47Jax7Njil9-a-0On5x9EbBwueoN2g4tF96hLR2LLipaOKfMkKTLLMrhGY7XDrX1z1Hz/s1600/decalogue.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjYPO_kMB_9AOmPZdYdt0kYda_sHcn7vmgb8WXWOrdc0_dKDjwOCIr_uzdp2XqW-9Lvu8BtAcTG47Jax7Njil9-a-0On5x9EbBwueoN2g4tF96hLR2LLipaOKfMkKTLLMrhGY7XDrX1z1Hz/s320/decalogue.jpg" width="212" /></a><br />
This book is a collection of essays, focused on the
Decalogue, its interpretations and devotional usage throughout the centuries.
Many of the great Christian thinkers are examined such as, Calvin, Luther,
Owen, Aquinas and Karl Barth. The book is edited by Jeffrey P. Greenman, who is
the Associate Dean of Biblical and Theological Studies and Professor of Christian
Ethics at Wheaton College and Timothy Larsen who functions as the Carolyn
and Fred McManis Professor of Christian Thought at Wheaton College.<br />
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I will admit from the start that this type of book is
difficult to review. Each chapter interacts with a “giant” of the Christian thought
and boiling down his or her musings on the Decalogue is a challenging task for
each of the 14 contributors. Therefore, I am striving to highlight certain
chapters, which grabbed my attention for either positive or negative reasons. Please
forgive my trendy, categorical approach to this review. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">The Most Interesting Chapter</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
To its credit, the book begins with a bang. Daniel Block
gives a wonderful introduction to the Decalogue and addresses some of the most
fundamental issues like, “Why are there ten commands and not five or seven?”, “Is
the Decalogue primarily a covenantal document or a recapitulation of moral law?”
and “Does the Ten Commands have a special place in the Pentateuch and/or the
Hebrew bible?” Block is not comprehensive with any of his answers, but sets a
stable foundation for the upcoming chapters. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Block’s most interesting observation is the debunking of the
traditional understanding of the two tablets. Tradition states that the Ten
were divided (in some way) on each tablet. Professor Block argues that the use
of “two” tablets were meant as a Near Eastern covenantal document and
therefore, each tablet contained the “Ten” and were kept as a visual covenant
between YHWH (one tablet) and Israel (one tablet). </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">The Most Biblical/Historical Chapters</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Chapter two is titled <i>The
Decalogue in the New Testament</i> and the subsequent chapter is <i>Early Syriac, Greek and Latin views of the
Decalogue</i>. These two chapters will satisfy the cravings of both the Biblicist
and Church historian. Dr. Craig Evans does a complete job analyzing the multiple
NT texts that deal directly or indirectly with the Decalogue. He also deals
with specific individuals of the NT (John the Baptist, Jesus, James and Paul)
and their use of the Ten Commandments. In my opinion, his abbreviated summary/chart
on the Decalogue’s use in the NT is the most practical (and re-usable) part of
the chapter. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Dr. Alison G. Salvesen is a research lecturer at Oxford and
specializes in the areas of rabbinic Judaism and early Christianity. She shows
her researching prowess in her overview, which spans to the fifth century. This
chapter interacts with both common and obscure characters with her attention placed
firmly on the Patristics’ view of the authority of the Decalogue. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
To this reviewer, Salvesen’s presentation of Justin Martyr
and Tertullian were both informative and captivating. She excavates from the writings
of Justin Martyr that he accepts the absorption view of the Decalogue, which
views Christ’s two commands (love God, love others) as absorbing the authority
and moral emphasis of the Ten Commandments. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Tertullian, according to Professor Salvesen, holds that the
Decalogue remains in force but is presently more stringent because Christ
expanded its commands. Yet the Latin Father’s dogmatism regarding the
communication of the Ten Commandments to Adam and Eve (whether embedded in
their conscience, verbalized or written is unclear) is fascinating and
thought-provoking. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">The Most Pastoral/Homiletical Chapters </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
If the above category needs further definition, I am
referring to the applicational and homiletic aspects of the Decalogue. In
examining the decalogical musings of Martin Luther (Chpt. 6) and John Calvin
(Chpt. 7), the reader will clearly observe the pastoral sensitivity of both
Reformers. Timothy J. Wengert, who teaches at Lutheran Theological Seminary in Philadelphia,
spends the majority of his chapter examining Luther’s shorter and larger catechism,
which discusses the practical ways to obey the Ten. Of all the essays, Wengert’s
is probably the most practical and therefore, the most pastoral. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Susan E. Schreiner, who is a historian at the University of
Chicago’s divinity school, provides the reader with a softer view of the
Reformer, who is often identified by the doctrine of predestination or the
burning of Michael Servetus. Dr. Schreiner’s essay focuses primarily on the
third purpose of the law (i.e. sanctification), which is seen through the lens
of Calvin’s Geneva, a unique bastion of church and state. One of Calvin’s
sermons on Deuteronomy 5:22 emphasized the completeness of the Decalogue and therefore,
encouraged his congregants to never add anything to the law, especially by the irresponsible
use of imagination. This intriguing application defined Calvin the preacher and
provides homiletic help to the pastors of the 21<sup>st</sup> century. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">The Most Confusing Chapter</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
George Hunsinger, professor of systematic theology at
Princeton Theological Seminary, has the unfortunate task of presenting Karl
Barth’s view of the Decalogue (chpt. 12). I admit that this reviewer has always
been stumped by the dialectic method of Barth and his neo-orthodox/Christological
hermeneutic is both annoying and refreshing. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I was hoping Dr. Hunsinger would be a “Barth-whisperer” for
me, but he did little to defuse my bias towards the Swiss theologian. So unless
you are a fan of Barth and his works, this chapter will likely leave you bored
and perplexed. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">The Most Unnecessary Chapter </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I wanted to use the adjectives <i>bias</i> or <i>political</i> to
describe this category. Why? Because though I find Christina Rossetti fascinating
as an Anglican, as a women and even as a poet, I was convinced her inclusion in
these essays is not about her impact in Decalogical studies, rather it was that
she was a woman and possibly, a feminist. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Timothy Larsen, one of the editors of this book, spends many
pages forming a biological sketch of Rossetti, defending her approach to hermeneutics
and her lifelong decision to be celibate, rather the discussing the actual
influence (or lack of) she has made in </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
But the most disturbing element of the chapter is Larsen’s
relentless effort to exonerate Rossetti from the label of “feminist”. In one
breath, he asserts that Rossetti voted against the woman’s right to vote, but
then writes how “gleeful she is when the bible shares that the wife is the more
impressive of the pair”. Rossetti seems to have an unusual preoccupation with
Eve. Larsen says later, </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“In a striking inversion of Victorian gender
stereotypes, Rosetti reads this (the account of the Fall) as the woman being
lead by her “mind” and the man by his “heart”. </blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Never mind that scripture says
Eve was deceived (2 Cor. 11:3) and theologically, there is no distinction
between the mind and the heart. The bottom line is Christina Rossetti is a charming
character, but she offers little clarity to the issues surrounding the Ten
Commandments. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">The Most Impactful Chapter</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Out of all of the authors, this reviewer was most familiar
with the works of Carl R. Trueman. Dr. Trueman is Professor of Historical
Theology and Church History at Westminster Theological Seminary in
Philadelphia. His topic was John Owen and his views of the Decalogue. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
There is one reason why this chapter was the most impactful:
Dr. Trueman strove to answer this question (from Owen’s theology), “If the Decalogue
is primary moral law, rather than covenantal law, what was the purpose for giving
the tablets on Mt. Sinai?” It is a monumental task of which Trueman (via Owen)
delivers. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The answer? Dr. Owen believes that the delivery of the law
at Sinai was essentially a recapitulation of the covenant of works. For this
reviewer, who stands in the dispensational camp, this interpretation was original
and eye-opening. This is not to say I agree with the interpretation of Owen,
but it does provide a robust argument for the legitimacy of the covenant of
works, especially since it is assumed to be clearly understood by our first
parents (according to Covenant theologians), though the means of divine
communication continues to be an in-house debate. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b>Conclusion</b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
As a resource in Decalogical studies, I judge this work to
be of reasonable help, primarily for those in academia or those who have a
taste for scholarly work. Unfortunately, most Christians and sadly, most
pastors will not take the time to excavate the “diamonds in the rough”. To be
honest, this resource would not be in my “top five”, though as a specialized
Decalogical study, I would place it in my “top ten”. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-53454543839041464802012-12-30T18:26:00.002-08:002012-12-30T19:30:50.345-08:00Did the "Giants of the Faith" make New Year's resolutions? <div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhka4THyGVpZxtkjyt4vLzV2m0A9i-hA1ozM5YQGgMF70eKNUjgDRGVsslhM-1M11HQBWx4VhShRe1LDQA5Rhh4ipiK21j5fbxYUNkwHYFlh2zVsvlXG_hm6plhyphenhyphenbPA161KEnLNZAxPIQQt/s1600/resolutions.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhka4THyGVpZxtkjyt4vLzV2m0A9i-hA1ozM5YQGgMF70eKNUjgDRGVsslhM-1M11HQBWx4VhShRe1LDQA5Rhh4ipiK21j5fbxYUNkwHYFlh2zVsvlXG_hm6plhyphenhyphenbPA161KEnLNZAxPIQQt/s1600/resolutions.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
Is setting resolutions for 2013 wrong? Did the men/women of old participate in a similar activity? Well, to be honest, no they didn't. The reason is New Year's Day is originally based on a pagan holiday and therefore, Christians of old didn't celebrate such days.<br />
<br />
Does that mean we shouldn't have a party or make resolutions? Ultimately, each Christian must act according to their conscience. That being established, America is not Rome (where New Year's Day originated) and there is no church/state government-regulated worship. Therefore, it is apples and oranges, as the saying goes.<br />
<br />
Actually, I strongly agree with the sentiment of Burk Parsons (editor of <i>Tabletalk </i>magazine and co-pastor at St. Andrews Chapel), who states that Christians should be <i><b><span style="font-size: large;">resolving to be resolved</span></b></i>. In his post, he encourages Christians to be<i> </i>resolving <i><b><span style="font-size: large;">sensibly, dependently, humbly</span></b> </i>and <span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>for the sake of Christ</i>.</b></span> To read the whole article, click on <a href="http://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/resolved-grace-god/?mobile=off">http://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/resolved-grace-god/?mobile=off</a> .<br />
<br />
So even though the giants didn't write down specific resolutions,<span style="font-size: x-large;"> I challenge you to examine (in the quotes below) their <i><b>resolving to be resolved</b></i>. </span><br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;">A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God’s truth is attacked and yet would remain </span><span style="font-size: large;">silent. </span></div>
<br />
John Calvin<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Grant that I may not pray alone with the mouth: help me that I may pray from the depths of my heart </span><br />
<br />
Martin Luther<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;">If we do not abide in prayer, we will abide in temptation. </span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
John Owen</blockquote>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">When I was young I was sure of everything. In a few years, having been mistaken a thousand times, I was not half so sure of most things as I was before. At present, I am hardly sure of anything but what God has revealed to me. </span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
John Wesley<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">O Holy Spirit, descend plentifully into my heart. Enlighten the dark corners of this neglected dwelling and scatter there Thy cheerful beams. </span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Augustine<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The truths that I know best I have learned on my knees. I never know a thing well, till it is burned into my heart by prayer. </span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
John Bunyan<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">A bushelful of resolutions is of small value; a single grain of practice, is worth the whole. </span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Charles Spurgeon </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The secret formula of the saints: When I am in the cellar of affliction, I look for the Lord's choicest wines. </span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Samuel Rutherford<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Lord, be pleased to shake my clay cottage before Thou throwest it down. Make it totter awhile before it doth tumble. Let me be summoned before I am surprised.</span><br />
</div>
<div>
Thomas Fuller<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Resolved, if I take delight in it as a gratification of pride, or vanity, or on any such account, immediately to throw it by. </span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Jonathan Edwards</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-58702794421962966262012-12-26T21:34:00.001-08:002012-12-26T21:34:42.125-08:00<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b style="font-size: xx-large;">Facts about John Knox: </b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">He remarried a woman named Margaret Stewart (age 17), who
was </span><i><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>33 years younger than Knox</b>.</span></i></li>
</ul>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">1/5 of his writings were about </span><span style="font-size: x-large;"><i><b>predestination</b></i>.</span></li>
</ul>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">John Calvin was his primary mentor.</span></li>
</ul>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">Knox wrote </span><b><i><span style="font-size: x-large;">none of his sermons down</span></i></b><span style="font-size: large;"> (only two sermons
survived).</span></li>
</ul>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">He was his spiritual father’s bodyguard and </span><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><i>carried a
broadsword</i></b>.</span></li>
</ul>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">His son-in-law was in prison for insubordination to the
throne. The king asked Elizabeth (Knox’s daughter) to persuade her husband to
submit to his authority. </span><i><b><span style="font-size: x-large;">Her response: “Please your Majesty, I’d rather have
his head here.”</span></b></i></li>
</ul>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">Knox is one of the four reformers on the wall of Geneva. The
words next to the Scottish reformer, </span><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><i>“One man with God is always in the
majority.” </i></b></span></li>
</ul>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-49363980885050151442012-12-22T15:57:00.001-08:002012-12-22T16:04:45.910-08:00Who is John Knox? <br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="background-color: white;">He was a minister of the Christian gospel who advocated violent revolution. He was considered one of the most powerful preachers of his day, but only two of the hundreds of sermons he preached were ever published. He is a key figure in the formation of modern Scotland, yet there is only one monument erected to him in Scotland, and his grave lies beneath a parking lot.</span><br />
<div class="text" style="background-color: white;">
<br />
John Knox was indeed a man of many paradoxes, a Hebrew Jeremiah set down on Scottish soil. In a relentless campaign of fiery oratory, he sought to destroy what he felt was idolatry and to purify Scotland's religion.</div>
<div class="text" style="background-color: white;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0YJOKSzJVUH1XEm0RwiXO15arBana-TpT6rdwGnDZz-gFyJqbcgWxWXYlSM3buqOdYYgO0Y2141p-PGZ4cFS2aFQ4SWAOJoH0gKEd04nMW1QpCrbA9kzNVnVxjsqXz620ipC-Crq0-UlQ/s1600/statue+of+john+knox.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0YJOKSzJVUH1XEm0RwiXO15arBana-TpT6rdwGnDZz-gFyJqbcgWxWXYlSM3buqOdYYgO0Y2141p-PGZ4cFS2aFQ4SWAOJoH0gKEd04nMW1QpCrbA9kzNVnVxjsqXz620ipC-Crq0-UlQ/s1600/statue+of+john+knox.jpg" /></a></div>
Biography </div>
<div class="text" style="background-color: white;">
<br />
John Knox was born around 1514, at Haddington, a small town south of Edinburgh. Around 1529 he entered the University of St. Andrews and went on to study theology. He was ordained in 1536, but became a notary, then a tutor to the sons of local lairds (lower ranking Scottish nobility).</div>
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Dramatic events were unfolding in Scotland during Knox's
youth. Many were angry with the Catholic church, which owned more than half the
real estate and gathered an annual income of nearly 18 times that of the crown.
Bishops and priests were often mere political appointments, and many never hid
their immoral lives: the archbishop of St. Andrews, Cardinal Beaton, openly
consorted with concubines and sired 10 children.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br />
In the early 1540s, Knox came under the influence of
converted reformers, and under the preaching of Thomas Guilliame, he joined
them. Knox then became a bodyguard for the fiery Protestant preacher George
Wishart, who was speaking throughout Scotland.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
In 1546, however, Beaton had Wishart arrested, tried,
strangled, and burned. In response, a party of 16 Protestant nobles stormed the
castle, assassinated Beaton, and mutilated his body. The castle was immediately
put to siege by a fleet of French ships (Catholic France was an ally to
Scotland). Though Knox was not privy to the murder, he did approve of it, and
during a break in the siege, he joined the besieged party in the castle.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
During a Protestant service one Sunday, preacher John Rough
spoke on the election of ministers, and publicly asked Knox to undertake the
office of preacher. When the congregation confirmed the call, Knox was shaken
and reduced to tears. He declined at first, but eventually submitted to what he
felt was a divine call.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
It was a short-lived ministry. In 1547, after St. Andrews
Castle had again been put under siege, it finally capitulated. Some of the
occupants were imprisoned. Others, like Knox, were sent to the galleys as
slaves.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Nineteen months passed before he and others were released.
Knox spent the next five years in England, and his reputation for preaching
quickly blossomed. But when Catholic Mary Tudor took the throne, Knox was
forced to flee to France.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
He made his way to Geneva, where he met John Calvin. The
French reformer described Knox as a "brother … laboring energetically for
the faith." Knox for his part, was so impressed with Calvin's Geneva, he
called it, "the most perfect school of Christ that was ever on earth since
the days of the apostles."</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
In 1555, they invited Knox to return to Scotland to inspire
the reforming task. Knox spent nine months preaching extensively and
persuasively in Scotland before he was forced to return to Geneva.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Away from his homeland again, he published some of his most
controversial tracts: In his Admonition to England he virulently attacked
the leaders who allowed Catholicism back in England. In The First Blast of
the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women he argued that a
female ruler (like English Queen Mary Tudor) was "most odious in the
presence of God" and that she was "a traitoress and rebel against
God." In his Appellations to the Nobility and Commonality of Scotland,
he extended to ordinary people the right—indeed the duty—to rebel against
unjust rulers. As he told Queen Mary of Scotland later, "The sword of
justice is God's, and if princes and rulers fail to use it, others may."</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Knox returned to Scotland in 1559, and he again deployed his
formidable preaching skills to increase Protestant militancy. Soon he was
elected the minister of the Edinburgh church, where he continued to exhort and
inspire. In his sermons, Knox typically spent half an hour calmly exegeting a
biblical passage. Then as he applied the text to the Scottish situation, he
became "active and vigorous" and would violently pound the pulpit.
Said one note taker, "he made me so to quake and tremble, that I could not
hold pen to write." Knox finished out his years as preacher of the Edinburgh
church, helping shape the developing Protestantism in Scotland. During this
time, he wrote his History of the Reformation of Religion in Scotland.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Though he remains a paradox to many, Knox was clearly a man
of great courage: one man standing before Knox's open grave said, "Here
lies a man who neither flattered nor feared any flesh." Knox's legacy is
large: his spiritual progeny includes some 750,000 Presbyterians in Scotland, 3
million in the United States, and many millions more worldwide.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
*This biography was copied and adapted from ChristianHistory.net. </div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-90165310153553417632012-12-21T06:04:00.003-08:002012-12-21T18:12:11.841-08:00Book Review: Ruth: From Bitter to Sweet<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEil6oyH8YI2A7XD3wWX8zse-f5kZf9a7BDhyELkmooZLDEzN1-SqydSyeDOp_YE9WFvT4VELCwZPk6fOXjM83lHkHsBKFGIh42PJol6IfA7dNJILwHasWJevtWQlc0s3-TymAWvcBmUpfML/s1600/Ruth.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEil6oyH8YI2A7XD3wWX8zse-f5kZf9a7BDhyELkmooZLDEzN1-SqydSyeDOp_YE9WFvT4VELCwZPk6fOXjM83lHkHsBKFGIh42PJol6IfA7dNJILwHasWJevtWQlc0s3-TymAWvcBmUpfML/s200/Ruth.jpg" width="131" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Dr. John D. Currid is Professor of Old Testament at Reformed
Theological Seminary in Charlotte, North Carolina. He has a PhD in archaeology
and has authored several commentaries (e.g. The Pentateuch, Habakkuk). In his
introduction, Dr. Currid breaks up the book of Ruth into five sections: Part
one—Setting the scene (1:1-5), Part two—Naomi and her Moabite daughter-in-laws
(1:6-22), Part three—In the fields of Bethlehem (2:1-23), Part four—The scene
at the Threshing Floor (3:1-18) and Part five—Redemption (4:1-22). These
sections encompass the majority of the commentaries’ brief 136 pages. Also, the
introduction contains the author’s valuable thesis statement, “Thus the book is
serving a greater purpose than merely being a moral story of human goodness: <i>it points to the future reality of the
coming King</i>”.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I would label Professor Currid’s commentary somewhere
between an exegetical commentary and a devotional one. To be clear, both
elements are beautifully integrated throughout. The exegetical component is not
only seen in the author’s commitment to the literary / historical context but
also in his detailed explanation of key words and phrases of each verse. As to
the devotional feature, Currid incorporates in each chapter the orthopraxical <i>Points to Ponder</i>, which helps the reader
be not just ‘a hearer of the Word, but also a doer’ (James 1:22). </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
For those readers who love Reformation history, you are in for a
treat. Every chapter is woven with either Puritan anecdotes or quotes from the
spiritual giants of previous times. Admittedly, Dr. Currid’s affection for the
past may not connect the young or modern reader, but what else would you expect
from a professor who received his doctorate in archeology, the study of <i>old stuff</i>? </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
One of the most important concepts of the book of Ruth is
the <i>goel </i>(Heb.) which means literally,
<i>kinsman-redeemer</i>. Here Dr. Currid is
at his literary best. His clear, engaging exegesis of this Israelite societal provision
is eye-opening. In just three pages, the author describes the four duties of
the <i>goel</i>, which all revolve around
the concept of redemption. Though most readers will automatically perceive the link
to the coming Messiah, Currid leaves no room for blindness and states, “Jesus
claims (in Luke 4) to be the one who will bring release and liberty to His
people; He is the <i>goel</i> for the
believer” (p. 92). </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Criticism </span></b> </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
If you were to ask any pastor or scholar, “What is the most
provocative part of Ruth?”, the answer is always, “<i>The scene of the threshing floor, </i>of course!” This scene is the
apex, the crescendo of the story. Ruth, by the advice of Naomi (her
mother-in-law), dolls herself up and sneaks into the bed of Boaz and lies down
at his feet. Provocative, indeed!</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Dr. Currid argues strongly that not only was this act culturally
<i>appropriate</i>, but there was <i><u>no sexual activity between Ruth and Boaz</u></i>.
He does admit that the term “uncover” is often used to describe sexual activity
in the OT, but the connection to Boaz’s feet speaks to redemption, not sexual
conduct. He states on page 104, Ruth ‘is asking that Boaz would be willing to
take her under his redemptive wings to protect her……the placing of the blanket
over her is symbolic of that protection and security’. Though I agree with the
author’s conclusion, I think this issue required direct interaction with those
views critical of his, of which he did not do. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Finally, I continue to be unsettled with the need for Ruth’s
nightly encounter with Boaz. Dr. Currid gives no cultural precedence for such an
interaction and his application of Ezekiel 16, though original to this
reviewer, is not convincing. I am left wondering if Naomi’s advice reveals
impatience, rather than godly discretion.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-size: large;"> Conclusion</span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
In my opinion, this resource is a wonderful addition to the
short list of Ruthian commentaries. Currid’s work is brief, readable and from
the reformed tradition (though it doesn’t feel that way). If you are just
starting to build your library, I would start with this work. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 14px;">Disclosure of Material Connection: I received this book free from Cross Focused Reviews as part of their Blogger Review Program. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission's 16 CFR, Part 255: "Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 14px;"><br /></span></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-17156700698248570852012-12-19T05:50:00.003-08:002012-12-19T21:40:00.419-08:005 things we learn from David Brainerd and his fight with Depression:<span style="font-size: large;">#1—Godly people can get depressed. </span>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Jonathan Edwards writes in the introduction of Brainerd’s
memoir, </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjWXw3Qoifqg95jlPxQAeXihj-xLkywxjHvMyOfiCZ_Y6_402bYY2urJmh5udgH9x_pWS18qYEkQadneR011LB0larmNTqfOVhlMcADHyukhtrnjfIwiTNQEBZWNL8kj2eATWAK5nviU8ez/s1600/depression.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjWXw3Qoifqg95jlPxQAeXihj-xLkywxjHvMyOfiCZ_Y6_402bYY2urJmh5udgH9x_pWS18qYEkQadneR011LB0larmNTqfOVhlMcADHyukhtrnjfIwiTNQEBZWNL8kj2eATWAK5nviU8ez/s1600/depression.jpg" /></a>“There is one thing in Mr. Brainerd, easily discernible by
the following account of his life, which may be called an imperfection in him,
which -- though not properly an imperfection of a moral nature, yet -- may
possibly be made an objection against the extraordinary appearances of religion
and devotion in him, by such as seek for objections against everything that can
be produced in favor of true vital religion; <b><i>and that is, that he was, by his
constitution and natural temper, so prone to melancholy and dejection of spirit</i></b>…..But
that Mr. Brainerd's temper or constitution inclined him to despondency, is no
just ground to suspect his extraordinary devotion to be only the fruit of a
warm imagination….As to Mr. Brainerd in particular, <b><i>notwithstanding his inclination
to despondency</i></b>, he was evidently one of those who usually are the
furthest from a teeming imagination; being of a penetrating genius, of clear
thought, of close reasoning, and a very exact judgment; as all know, who knew
him.” </blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Yet Brainerd lived a godly life. His peers described him as
a “holy” man. His memoirs revealed he was certainly a man “of the Word”. So why
did he struggle with bouts of depression (i.e. melancholy)? </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br />
I think part of the answer lies in Edwards’ statement, “….and
that is, that he was, <b><i>by his constitution and natural temper</i></b>,
so prone to melancholy and dejection of spirit”. In other words, Brainerd was
born with a propensity towards depression. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Here are Brainerd’s own words: </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“I was from my youth <b><i>somewhat sober, and inclined rather to
melancholy than the contrary extreme</i></b>; but do not remember anything of
conviction of sin, worthy of remark, till I was, I believe, about seven or
eight years of age.”</blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
To be clear, Edwards’ words should not be understood as an
excuse or a reference to a disposition that is exempt from the renewing power
of the Holy Spirit (Titus 3:5). Rather, because humanity is born with sin, many
individuals are more susceptible towards certain sins. Brainerd’s dark
disposition was in a sense, his personalized consequence of Original Sin, which
was used by the Father to cause “all things to work together for good” and to
carve him into the image of His Son (Romans 8:28-29). </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Don’t forget…<br />
<br />
· Elijah was so depressed he wanted to die (I Kings 19:4). <br />
<br />
· King David experienced a spiritual depression because of his murderous / adulterous sin (Psa. 32:3-4) <br />
<br />
· Job’s depression led him to curse the day he was born (Job 3:1). <br />
<br />
· Solomon’s depression was ignited when his own efforts did not bring satisfaction (Ecc. 2:20). <br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>All these men loved the Lord,</b></span> <span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><i>but for a time succumbed to seasons of despair</i>. </b></span><br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;">#2—Depression must be fought at the <i>spiritual</i> level. </span><span style="font-size: x-large; font-weight: bold;"> </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br />
I am aware that some readers will criticize my narrow
perspective on this issue. What about chemical imbalances? What if there was
something medically wrong with the young missionary? To be clear, as a biblical
counselor, the first task I give a counselee is to fill out a Personal Data
Inventory Sheet, which among other things, asks the necessary medical
questions.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
But if there is no legitimate
medical disorder, the counselee must conduct an all-out assault against sin (specifically
in Brainerd’s case, the sin of unbelief). <span style="font-size: x-large;">The mental and emotional presence of
depression is not necessarily sin</span>, but neglecting to “put on” the fruits of the
Spirit and “put off “ the deeds of the flesh is both active and passive
disobedience towards God. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I hope I am not coming across as indifferent or insensitive.
I can empathize <i>to some degree</i> with
Brainerd. After a certain recent event in my life, I found myself in a state of
depression. This condition is unusual for me and I could not seem to climb out
of the pit of despair. I knew the right verses to meditate on, but I felt numb,
both emotionally and physically. Though in previous dark times I have been able
to “grind through”, but this time was different. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
How did I pull out? After some long bouts of wrestling and
arguing with God, I repented of my anxiety, impatience and lack of trust in
God’s perfect plan. Then….</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I chose to abide in Christ. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I chose to trust His plan and His promises. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I chose to believe that His word is truly sufficient. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I chose to have joy. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I chose re-engagement with the mission. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I chose to pray for others when I start to wallow in
self-pity.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Do I still have dark moments that tempt me to slide into the
mire of depression? Yes, but I strive to live the words of McCheyne who said, “For
every look at yourself, take ten looks at Christ.” </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;">#3—Too much spiritual introspection is harmful. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I wrote about this in a previous post, so I won’t rehash
much. It is important to note that people that struggle with depression are
often self-absorbed and prone to obsessive thoughts. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I mused, </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“To be clear, some
introspection is good, necessary and biblical. Paul evidently taught and lived
the below truth. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>2 Corinthians 13:5 Examine yourselves, to see whether
you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Or do you not realize this about
yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you? Unless indeed you fail to meet the
test!</b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
So, test yourself. Ask others to assess your spirituality.
Pray that God reveals to you the pervasiveness of your sin. Small portions of
this are necessary to become like Christ (Rom. 8:29). But be warned, excessive
reflection is idolatry. Your personal sanctification becomes the
idol. Mind you, this type of idolatry is rare (in my opinion), but if the
heart is a factory of idolatry (as Calvin says), then each heart fashions
different idols since each heart belongs to a uniquely created person.” </blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
(To read the whole post, click here: <a href="http://cpletter.blogspot.com/2012/11/david-brainerda-man-who-thought-often.html">http://cpletter.blogspot.com/2012/11/david-brainerda-man-who-thought-often.html</a>)
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;">#4—Mental and physical fatigue increases depression
tendencies. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Today’s medical community has established the connection
between fatigue and depression. A recent medical study states, </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Depression and fatigue may feed off each other in a vicious
cycle that makes it hard to determine where one begins and the other ends,
according to a new study. Researchers found people who are depressed are more than
four times as likely to develop unexplained fatigue, and <b><i>those who suffer from fatigue are
nearly three times as likely to become depressed</i></b>.” (WebMD Health News—June
2004)</blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Ironically, Brainerd’s biographer labels his two greatest
imperfections as being <b><i>prone to melancholy</i></b> and living <b><i>in a
state of constant fatigue</i></b>. </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Another imperfection in Mr. Brainerd, which may be observed
in the following account of his life, was his life, was his being excessive in
his labors; not taking due care to proportion his fatigues to his strength.”</blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
As I wrote in a previous article, the reader must not judge
the frail missionary too harshly. Yet the fact remained that Brainerd’s zealous
fervor likely exasperated his dark disposition and took years off his life. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Brothers and sisters, run hard the race of faith (Hebrews
12:1-2). But remember: ALL the greatest athletes take care of themselves, which
includes knowing (and listening to) your physical limits. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Check out my previous post for some practical help regarding
this issue. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<a href="http://cpletter.blogspot.com/2012/11/david-brainerda-man-who-didnt-take-care.html">http://cpletter.blogspot.com/2012/11/david-brainerda-man-who-didnt-take-care.html</a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;">#5—Don’t live according to your feelings. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
This is the most important lesson the reader can absorb from
the life of Brainerd. If you follow Jesus, but seem to be plagued with seasons
of depression, please read carefully (and prayerfully) the following words. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
First and foremost, David Brainerd never let his feelings
guide his life. His journal revealed that he constantly fought feelings of
unworthiness and inadequacy. Yet instead of lying in bed, whining or numbing
the pain, he bathed himself in the scriptures and continually asked for divine
help. Did Brainerd always have strong affections for those Indians he was
called to serve? He admitted in his
journal that often he did not. But did he choose to love them anyways? Yes, he
did. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
God simply wants our obedience. This is where faith lives. Scripture
is clear, “For we walk by faith, not by sight” (2 Cor. 5:7). One of my mentors
used to say, “Think right, act right and someday you will feel right.”
<span style="font-size: x-large;">Remember, God never commands His children to act <i><b>according to our feelings</b></i>, but <i><b>simply to act according to His will</b></i>. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Wayne Grudem, in his magnum opus <i>Systematic Theology</i>, states, “Sin makes us irrational”. The
unavoidable reality is that our feelings will fluctuate until we are made
perfect in Heaven. </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>2 Corinthians 4:16 So we do not lose heart. Though our outer
nature is wasting away, our inner nature is being renewed day by day. 17 For
this slight momentary affliction is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory
beyond all comparison, 18 as we look not to the things that are seen but to the
things that are unseen. For the things that are seen are transient, but the
things that are unseen are eternal. </b></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Brainerd longed for Heaven. He longed for Christ. He longed
to get rid of this perishable body. He longed for the eradication of his sin
nature. <span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><i>He made an active decision to listen to the Spirit’s voice of
illumination</i></b>, </span>rather than his frail feelings which tried to lead or keep him
wallowing in Bunyan’s Slough of Despond. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-4868048932359401312012-12-14T06:02:00.002-08:002012-12-14T06:13:08.403-08:00Book Review: Rebels Rescued: A Student's Guide to Reformed Theology<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhddbsqlpb7ILcAQi8nO_3Y8oRU_elEJ_SRKruUaYwUpgn0OPslsoqAq48MevD5J7tFU-t9gnlUAZNvH35tpoo7yXHfT331u3-FLe4EB8Ztp5XRm8aWZ_01vfew7O2sjlK5C8eZDYzygpdX/s1600/Rebels+Rescued.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhddbsqlpb7ILcAQi8nO_3Y8oRU_elEJ_SRKruUaYwUpgn0OPslsoqAq48MevD5J7tFU-t9gnlUAZNvH35tpoo7yXHfT331u3-FLe4EB8Ztp5XRm8aWZ_01vfew7O2sjlK5C8eZDYzygpdX/s200/Rebels+Rescued.jpg" width="200" /></a>The author is Brian H. Cosby, who is the lead Pastor at
Wayside Presbyterian Church in Signal Mountain, Tennessee. He is the author of
the youth ministry best-seller, <i>Giving up
Gimmicks</i> and has also published biographies on John Bunyan and David
Brainerd. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Cosby begins the book by asking an important question, “What
is Reformed Theology?” In this introductory chapter and/or introduction, the
author sets the course for this brief 112 page book. His goal is simply stated
on page 3, “This book is an introduction to Reformed Theology with a particular
view towards teenagers”. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
How does Cosby plan to achieve such a lofty goal? To begin,
he purposely makes the book ascetically relevant. The front cover is bright red
with funky lettering and a title that attracts the rebellious teenager, <b><i>Rebels
Rescued</i></b>. Also, the graphics of the chapter titles remind the reader of
paintbrush strokes and possibly a subtle graffiti theme. For all of his
anti-gimmick language, Cosby is keen to draw upon the angst of the American
adolescent. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Furthermore, the words of the chapter titles are simple and
shrewd. Total Depravity is replaced by <i>Rebels
at Heart</i>. Limited Atonement is <i>For
His sheep</i>. Irresistible Grace is booted for <i>Mastered by Grace</i>. Sola Scriptura is cast aside for <i>Enjoying God’s Word</i>. Cosby’s emphasis on
theological concepts rather than the classic terms is a clever, astute
strategy. Lastly, the illustrations used by the author are modern, personal,
well-placed and humorous. Oh, and one more thing: Dr. Cosby surprisingly evades
the fatal flaw of cheesy rhetoric, which can quickly annoy a perceptive teenage
reader. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Another pertinent question this reviewer asked was, “Did the
author water-down Reformed Theology in order to make it palatable to his teen
audience?” Not at all. In Cosby’s chapter on Unconditional Election, the author
seeks to save Calvin from popular criticism. He argues, </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Because Calvin seemed to take freedom away from man, Calvin
has been given a bad rap. But what Calvin sought to do, however, was to show
that man’s heart is not free to begin with. Our hearts are prone to wander away
from Christ every time—if left on our own. Apart from God’s grace in giving us
new hearts to love him, we remain chained and imprisoned by sin and unbelief.
There is no freedom apart from God’s work of grace and it’s grace precisely
because his salvation is something we don’t deserve.”</blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
No mincing of words here. How about Limited Atonement? Cosby
must have soften on this point, right? Judge for yourself. </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“God is not in the business of taking risks. He’s in the
business of purposefully saving his people by grace. He doesn’t scatter the
breadcrumbs of atonement across the world in hopes that some will happen to see
them and eat. No, God sent his Son to die for his people “according to the
purpose of his will” (Ephesians 1:5). Christ’s death was purposeful,
intentional, and definite!” </blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
And yet Dr. Cosby never shoots over the heads of his
audience. Though he uses illustrations generously, he intensely desires the
reader to understand that ‘Reformed Theology is first and foremost biblical
theology (p. 5). This statement is reinforced by a liberal splattering of
biblical references, which can be found on virtually every page. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Any theological system has its detractors and the Reformed
perspective is no exception. In this book, Dr. Cosby endeavors to address the
most common objections to Predestination and Limited Atonement. Again, I was astounded
how seamless and succinct these arguments were. No tangents, no hobby horses. In
dealing with the issue of evangelism and predestination, the reader is simply reminded
that God ordains not only the end, but also the means. Therefore, there is no room
for indifference towards the proclamation of the gospel. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The concept of Limited Atonement is without question the
most debated of the Five Points of Calvinism. Cosby wisely funnels all his
attention to 1 John 2:2, the preeminent text used to attack this doctrine. Here
he gives the typical retort, discussing the various ways to understand the word
“world” and then gives the reader John’s contextual meaning of the “whole world”.
I was a little surprised the author did not allude to the wide evangelical
disagreement about this doctrine, but again, a comprehensive 100 page book on
Reformed Theology limits such eye-opening statements.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b>Criticisms </b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
It is a habit of this reviewer to alert the reader to
inherent flaws or inconsistencies within each book. I have no criticisms. In my
opinion, this is one of the clearest treatments of Reformed Theology I have
ever read. Rebels Rescued is a literary landmark in the genre of Youth and
Theology. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I guess if I would to add anything, I wish Dr. Cosby would
have included a robust appendix, which would better prepare the small group
leader or young theologian from the verbal darts of the anti-Reformed community.
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b> Conclusion </b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
This book is a masterpiece. It should be read by every youth
leader and used as annual curriculum in every teenage small group. Furthermore,
Cosby’s work should be used as a theological primer in Christian colleges
and/or given as a membership gift in churches that reside in the Reformed tradition. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Disclosure of Material Connection: I received this book free from Cross Focused Reviews as part of their Blogger Review Program. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission's 16 CFR, Part 255: "Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising."</span><br /><div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-70212487083200823762012-12-10T21:37:00.000-08:002012-12-10T21:37:06.730-08:00David Brainerd—A man whose influence was greater after his death<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
***The article was taken and adapted from <i>David Brainerd: A Constant Stream</i> by David B. Calhoun, Ph.D.</div>
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiV00TWGE6Bd8IA0LMOXkY3-1HSSI45WSXvg0LiNv78nUMiKUimcHy0N_QabVnLxMGTSX8m1muiMpQPTvKjUfxFy1xKOu0XZWA4y_P90FWZO3k7fYw19V5Hte3cKLZG7qz79bctI7NErIcJ/s1600/Brainerd2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="279" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiV00TWGE6Bd8IA0LMOXkY3-1HSSI45WSXvg0LiNv78nUMiKUimcHy0N_QabVnLxMGTSX8m1muiMpQPTvKjUfxFy1xKOu0XZWA4y_P90FWZO3k7fYw19V5Hte3cKLZG7qz79bctI7NErIcJ/s320/Brainerd2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Brainerd’s influence grew remarkably within the
transatlantic evangelical community through <i>The Life of David Brainerd</i>,
Edwards’s most frequently reprinted and widely read book. It was the first
American biography to reach a large European audience. It became the
best-selling religious book in nineteenth-century America (with more than
thirty different editions) and remains in print to the present day.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-size: x-large;">John Wesley</span></b> prepared an abridged version of Edwards’s book
and recommended it with the words: </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Let every preacher read carefully over The
Life of David Brainerd. Let us be followers of him, as he was of Christ, in
absolute self-devotion, in total deadness to the world, and in fervent love to
God and man.”</blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
In 1769 <b><span style="font-size: x-large;">John Newton</span></b> wrote: </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Next to the Word of God, I like
those books best which give an account of the lives and experiences of His
people… No book of this kind has been more welcome to me than the life of Mr.
Brainerd of New England.”</blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Brainerd’s missionary career spanned less than five years,
but Edwards’s Life of David Brainerd revealed a missionary hero whose impact
was astounding. The little book made a significant contribution to the new era
of missions that sent British and American Christians to many parts of the
world. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
As <b><span style="font-size: x-large;">William Carey</span></b> prepared to go to India, Brainerd’s Life
was “almost a second Bible.” When Carey, Ward, and Marshman signed the historic
agreement that laid down the principles of their missionary work at Serampore,
they agreed to “often look at Brainerd in the woods of America, pouring out his
very soul before God for the perishing heathen without whose salvation nothing
could make him happy.”</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>Robert Murray McCheyne</b></span> was deeply moved when he first read
Brainerd’s Life in 1832. He remarked that as a result of Brainerd’s example he
was “more set upon missionary enterprise than ever.” A few years later McCheyne
wrote in a letter: “O to have Brainerd’s heart for perfect holiness.”</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
In the preface to an 1851 reprint of The Life of David
Brainerd, <b><span style="font-size: x-large;">Horatius Bonar</span></b> warned against taking Brainerd’s life as a perfect
life and points out some few defects, but goes on to hold up his life as a
protest “against the easy-minded religion of our day.” If Brainerd’s life,
Bonar stated, is used to quicken our consciences and urge us forward in the
“same path of high attainment,” we will find it “an unspeakable blessing.” The
example of Brainerd’s “life of marvelous nearness to… God, which he lived
during his brief day on earth,” continues to inspire Christians, Bonar wrote.
“His life was not a great life, as men use the word,” Bonar concluded, but it
was “a life of one plan, expending itself in the fulfillment of one great aim,
and in the doing of one great deed—serving God.”</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Two hundred and fifty years after Brainerd’s death, The Life
of David Brainerd still challenges and inspires readers. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-size: x-large;">Oswald J. Smith</span></b>, founding pastor of the People’s Church in
Toronto, paid tribute to Brainerd with these words:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
So greatly was I influenced by the life of David Brainerd in the early years of
my ministry that I named my youngest son after him. When I was but eighteen
years of age, I found myself 3,000 miles from home, a missionary to the
Indians. No wonder I love Brainerd! Brainerd it was who taught me to fast and
pray. I learned that greater things could be wrought by daily contact with God
than by preaching. When I feel myself growing cold I turn to Brainerd and he
always warms my heart. No man ever had a greater passion for souls. To live
wholly for God was his one great aim and ambition.3</blockquote>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
A few years ago, <b><span style="font-size: x-large;">John Piper </span></b>wrote:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
I thank God for the ministry of David Brainerd in my own life—the passion for
prayer, the spiritual feast of fasting, the sweetness of the Word of God, the
unremitting perseverance through hardship, the relentless focus on the glory of
God, the utter dependence on grace, the final resting in the righteousness of
Christ, the pursuit of perishing sinners, the holiness while suffering, the
fixing the mind on what is eternal, and finishing well without cursing the
disease that cut him down at twenty-nine.</blockquote>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
The “constant stream” still flows.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">To read the whole article, click on the link below. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<a href="http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/David%20Brainerd_A_Constant_Stream_SinglePage">http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/David%20Brainerd_A_Constant_Stream_SinglePage</a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<br />
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-81772064834202837792012-12-09T16:21:00.002-08:002012-12-09T18:38:50.262-08:00Book Review: Missional Moves<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBKv94GzI3stg2t_xOf43wYY8ZO3ryRU2a73iMtOcx_NXOvZJ1d7JTkDsiCdKp5zrHKBJfrtWq3BeR14SsIEsKIeu_UI-s7OvxASao3H-dyZ0C8sKfOqArSHLJ3BEYOBvYm4eZijGinBP6/s1600/missional+moves.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBKv94GzI3stg2t_xOf43wYY8ZO3ryRU2a73iMtOcx_NXOvZJ1d7JTkDsiCdKp5zrHKBJfrtWq3BeR14SsIEsKIeu_UI-s7OvxASao3H-dyZ0C8sKfOqArSHLJ3BEYOBvYm4eZijGinBP6/s1600/missional+moves.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The subtitle reveals the simple premise of the book: <span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>15
tectonic shifts that transform churches, communities and the world</i></b>.</span> As
expected, each chapter deals with one of the fifteen tectonic shifts. What are
these tectonic shifts? In a word, these shifts interact with the concept of <i>mission</i>, <i>missional living</i> or the more technical term, <i>missiology</i>. It is the belief of the authors that most churches are
unaware of these shifts and therefore, are less effective in reaching the world
for Christ. So this book boldly seeks to inform a generation of church leaders through
the experimental lens of Granger Community Church (a megachurch in Northern
Indiana where the author, Rob Wegner, is one of the lead pastors).</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
It is not in the scope of this review to critically interact
with each tectonic shift, but extensive comments on a few key shifts are
necessary. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Let’s begin with the <i>Shift #1: Saved souls to Saved
wholes</i>. The authors contend that many churches preach an incomplete gospel or
maybe more specifically, only part of the grand story of salvation. These churches
tend to focus on the life insurance aspect of the gospel (i.e. saved souls),
rather than the salvific blessings which are intended for this life and the
next (i.e. saved wholes). According to the authors, the sad result has been a response that is decisional
and private, rather than transformational and public. In other words, what is
often missing in the “saved souls” version is the emphasis on Lordship. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
To the majority of the above paragraph, I say, “Amen”. Furthermore,
I appreciate the authors beginning with the gospel. I agree with the statement found
on page 40, “Every other missional move is contingent upon getting this one
right”. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Yet I am still slightly uncomfortable with the distinction of
“saved souls” to “saved wholes”. Scripturally, there is no theological distinction
in justification between soul and whole. Justification by faith alone assumes
trust, which assumes Lordship. When the <i>soul</i>
is regenerated, the <i>whole </i>is also
regenerated. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
So though I like that the move is “catchy”, let us not become
weary in pursuing theological “precision” as well.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
My favorite chapter is <i>Shift #2, From Missions to Mission</i>. Though I am personally familiar with this
shift, the basic graph on p. 49 says it all. The graph places the ministry of “missions”
alongside arts, children, small groups, youth, etc. The problem? Missions is
seen as a specialized category of ministry, rather than “THE MISSION” given to
every Christian. In my opinion, this chapter alone is worth the price of the book.
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Now this does not mean I embrace everything in chapter two.
The formula espoused by the authors: <b>Local
church on mission + People of God on mission = Apostolic movement</b> is again <i>catchy</i>, but invoking the word “apostolic”
for anything other than the direct ministry of the 12 original apostles is unwise
and hermeneutically cavalier. Post 1<sup>st</sup> century Christians are called
disciples, followers and slaves of Jesus Christ, but never His apostles. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Another helpful element is that this book not only explains
the “shifts” themselves, <span style="font-size: x-large;">but also how to implement these movements into the life
of the local church.</span> The clearest example of this is found in chapter 7, <i>From
Transactional to Transformational Partnerships</i>. The authors explain, </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“The old model sent out organizations to do the work of
mission, leaving the local church behind to provide money. The local church was
involved, but not directly” (p. 168). </blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
So the issue the authors wrestle with is, “How do we get
local churches involved directly and still use these essential partnerships?” </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
With the use of illustrations, graphs and the experimental history
of Granger, the reader is given a roadmap to build local church involvement and partnership,
which functions as a wonderful resource, especially for those leaders in established
churches. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Criticism</b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Other than the occasional examples of theological ambiguity,
my only other criticism is this: 15 missional moves was too much. I think the
maxim “Less is more” applies here. Limiting and then expanding 5-7 moves would
have been more useful in my opinion.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b style="text-indent: 0.5in;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b style="text-indent: 0.5in;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: 0px;">
<span style="text-indent: 0.5in;"> <span style="font-size: large; font-weight: bold;">Conclusion</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Would I recommend this book? Yes, but only to mature pastor
or church leader. The authors are unabashedly seeker-driven (attractional, in
their words) and their philosophy is woven through this book. Yet there are also
profound insights regarding missiology that if absorbed correctly could benefit
both the church leader and the church itself. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Disclosure of Material Connection: I received this book free
from Cross Focused Reviews as part of their Blogger Review Program. I was not
required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own.
I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission's 16 CFR,
Part 255: "Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in
Advertising."</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-49495899634397775052012-12-05T05:47:00.000-08:002012-12-05T06:08:11.059-08:00David Brainerd—A man who lived on mission (as ALL Christians should be)<div>
David Brainerd was special. Not because he was a missionary (every Christian is a missionary), but because of how he lived as a missionary. His words below reveal his heart: </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">"All my desire was the conversion of the heathen... I declare, now I am dying, I would not have spent my life otherwise for the whole world."</span></blockquote>
<div>
I want to live like David Brainerd. I want to love others like David Brainerd. I want to have the heart of God for the lost. Do I need a specific people group to do this, to "live on mission"? Nope. Just obey and follow Christ. He was very clear before He left to tell His followers what we should be doing until He returns. </div>
<div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Acts 1:8 But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, <i><b>and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.</b></i>"</blockquote>
</div>
<div>
Recently, I wrote the post below for a friend's blog. In it, I dealt with a few practical ways to engage our culture. Sometimes we need just a gentle reminder....getting back to the basics, the fundamentals, if you will. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpFirst">
<b><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;">An Idiot’s guide to successful (and
biblical) "cultural engagement”:<o:p></o:p></span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNdIDTzkLokKhjFhhsQtnu8bu_Wt4ees5kzV5RwUA9z8QyINtlvhNVrzFsl2_TRA00fEwEKGs2iYRjW82dhhVN_wcs9nJpbBmXKcJppAUEheR4_TK87WTTokaDPK1C28Xq_lpZyLM8902E/s1600/Idiot's+guide.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="193" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNdIDTzkLokKhjFhhsQtnu8bu_Wt4ees5kzV5RwUA9z8QyINtlvhNVrzFsl2_TRA00fEwEKGs2iYRjW82dhhVN_wcs9nJpbBmXKcJppAUEheR4_TK87WTTokaDPK1C28Xq_lpZyLM8902E/s320/Idiot's+guide.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
To anyone who is
already offended by the title of this blog post, please read the disclaimer
below:<br />
<br />
<b>
Disclaimer: The use of the word "idiot" is not meant to be an
intellectual assessment of the readership of this blog. Rather, I use this word
as a "cultural point of reference" or an example of contextualization
(since the first <i>Idiot’s Guide</i> was
published in the late 1990’s). </b></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
I often describe myself
as a “detoxing fundamentalist”. To be clear, I still embrace and appreciate the
historical definition of “fundamentalism”, but reject the fundamentalism of last
60 years which often implanted Christian orthopraxy into the fight for Christian
orthodoxy. </div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
I say all this because
10 years ago I would have rejected the term “cultural engagement” and 5 years
ago I would have looked it with suspicion. For me, the term was just another
way to dilute the message of the gospel and/or justify unholy affections. </div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
Today, I embrace the
term mainly because I understand more clearly the realities of my mission. </div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
So in a way, this <i>Idiot’s Guide</i> is meant to <i>guide</i> the young pups, <i>remind </i>the adult dogs and <i>teach</i> the old dogs (detoxing
fundamentalists) new tricks. <br />
<br />
Here are four practical ways to “engage the culture”: <br />
<br />
<b><span style="font-size: x-large;">Be observant.</span><o:p></o:p></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
Acts 17:16 “Now while
Paul was waiting for them at Athens, his spirit was provoked within him <b><i>as he
saw that the city was full of idols.” <o:p></o:p></i></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br />
Paul was living a single-minded, strategic, eyes-open” approach to his mission.
He was not just looking for people, but looking around in culture to see what
people are worshipping. In other words, the zealous apostle was observing with
the goal to find common ground (i.e. talking points) with unbelievers. </div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
So, look around. Where
to begin? Well, this advice helped me. Pray for a missional mindset in your <i>recreation</i>, <i>occupation </i>and residential <i>location.</i>
Catchy and practical. </div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br />
<b><span style="font-size: x-large;">Be a listener. </span><o:p></o:p></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
I once read that ‘Francis Schaeffer, the great 20th century apologist, was asked what he’d do if he had an hour to share the gospel with someone. He responded by saying he’d listen for 55 minutes and then, in the last 5 minutes, have something meaningful to say’. <br />
<br />
In other words, he listened in order to speak the gospel directly to their story. <br />
<br />
Chuck Colson spoke of something similar. He wrote, <br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“We must enter into the stories of the surrounding culture, which takes real listening. We connect with the literature, music, theater, arts, and issues that express the existing culture’s hopes, dreams, and fears. This builds a bridge by which we can show how the Gospel can enter and transform those stories.”</blockquote>
Yet, let us not deceive ourselves, listening is not natural. <span style="font-size: x-large;">It is a work of grace because listening requires humility and compassion.</span> I have often meditated on the verse below. <br />
<br />
James 1:19 This you know, my beloved brethren. But everyone must be quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger; <br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>Know your bible.</b></span>
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--><br />
<!--[endif]--></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
This is not just
important because it is vital in the Christian's process of maturity, but it
also crucial to our knowledge of ourselves and our fellow man. </div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
John Calvin, the
Genevan reformer, states, </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"No man can survey himself without immediately turning his thoughts
towards the God in whom he lives and moves; because it is perfectly obvious,
that the endowments which we possess cannot possibly be from ourselves; nay,
that our very being is nothing else than subsistence in God alone."</blockquote>
<!--[endif]--><br />
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
Calvin understood that
since humanity is made in the image of God then <b><i>seeing God means seeing ourselves</i></b>.
Studying the bible, then, widens our view of God, renews our sin-cursed mind
and reveals to us what true humanity is and more importantly, in WHOM true
humanity is seen. </div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
Finally, <span style="font-size: x-large;">it is
important to remember that a scripture-informed mind makes you a skillful
surgeon, one who is able to pinpoint not just the symptom but the cause of the
individual’s unbelief.</span> Knowledge of specific cultures and societal
idiosyncrasies is helpful, but knowing the Creator of humanity and His gospel
provides the confidence to disseminate the universal antidote to every tongue,
tribe and nation. </div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>Pray for revival.</b> </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
Let us never forget
that methodology is always the subservient to Pneumatology (i.e. the doctrine
of the Holy Spirit). Scripture is clear that the Holy Spirit blows where it
wishes (John 3:8). Therefore, God is the ONLY ONE who can open up the eyes of blind humanity. We must pray for it. Plead for it. It is amazing to me that all God desires are willing servants who are faithful to
communicate His message to a dying world. Have you prayed for a revival in your context today? Are you ready to be a part of the answer to that prayer? </div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: center;">
<b>Conclusion<o:p></o:p></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
To sum it up: If we are
on my knees, praying for a revival, loving what God loves, we will see the
harvest for what it really is: a sea of fruit that is ripe today, but may be
withered and dead tomorrow. </div>
<div class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle">
<br /></div>
</div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-24312698094142889572012-11-30T05:51:00.003-08:002012-12-04T04:46:31.332-08:00Book Review: I AM…Exploring the I AM sayings of John’s Gospel <br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNdlh_kd8Fgql54I9O4JNGhyphenhyphenXaar4MrKwoLQ2clBtu4Z2_fhd_Nn_tOK5NEd8OWlPP6oxchgUPH8ccXxshIY84cf2CwXVEjUgvxJPk0jnxljP9B2jmKP502X9FOge0JFsaUrER49bGxKvY/s1600/I+AM+by+Iain+Campbell.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNdlh_kd8Fgql54I9O4JNGhyphenhyphenXaar4MrKwoLQ2clBtu4Z2_fhd_Nn_tOK5NEd8OWlPP6oxchgUPH8ccXxshIY84cf2CwXVEjUgvxJPk0jnxljP9B2jmKP502X9FOge0JFsaUrER49bGxKvY/s1600/I+AM+by+Iain+Campbell.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The author, Dr. Iain D. Campbell, is from Scotland. But
where is lives is not as important as who he is. Dr. Campbell is a pastor and as
a good preacher, his small book harmonizes the theological and practical in a
seamless way. In the introduction, the premise of the book is clear: The seven ‘I
AM’ sayings of the gospel of John are unique to the other gospels and therefore
are worthy of exclusive study. So just
like a good sermon, Campbell provides an introduction, seven chapters and a
brief conclusion. <span style="font-size: x-large;">In my opinion, this is 122 pages of pure delight.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Each chapter begins with a brief historical sketch of the particular
‘I AM’ saying. Understanding the context is crucial to interpretation and in a
winsome way the Scottish preacher diligently transports the reader back to the
ministry of Jesus through the eyes of the apostle John. The most excellent
example of this is found in chapter two, <i>Jesus
the Light</i>. The author states, </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“The other feature of the Feast of Tabernacles, as it was
celebrated in Jesus’ time, was the lighting of particular lamps in the temple;
four great lamps were lit every evening, so that the temple was ablaze with
light. At the close of the feast, one lamp was left unlit, symbolizing, in the
thinking of the Jewish people, that full salvation had not yet come…..therefore,
it is significant that, as the Feast closes….Jesus should say ‘I am the light
of the world’”(p. 28). </blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Then after drawing out the meaning, Campbell spends the rest
of the chapter unpacking the depth of the sayings of Jesus with the use of
engaging illustrations and pointed application. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
One of the stand-out features of the book is the ability of Dr.
Campbell to be holistically gospel-focused. At the end of each chapter is a
written version of an altar call, which makes this book evangelistic and
edifying, all at the same time. This focus was so apparent that I remember
thinking, “How often we challenge an unbeliever to read the gospel of John in
order to find and know Jesus. This book should be given and used as an evangelistic
companion to the gospel of John!” </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
It is normative to be critical at some point during a book
review. I gladly admit it was difficult for me to find much to criticize,
though Campbell’s connection of the divine number “7” to the number of
Johannine ‘I AM’ sayings is suspect (p. 107). To his credit, the author does
not simply gloss over his claim, he does offer some defense, yet I still find
it lacking and obviously the uniqueness of Jesus does not stand or fall on the innovative
use of the divine “7”. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
To conclude, I emphatically endorse this book. Pastors should
have it for its value as a commentary, small group leaders should integrate it bi-annually
and new Christians should build their devotional library around it. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
**I would like to extend my gratitude to Cross-Focused Media for the free copy of the book for me to offer this unbiased, balanced review as well as EP Books.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-64335505109962467462012-11-27T20:42:00.003-08:002012-11-27T21:42:14.859-08:00David Brainerd—A man who struggled loving the people God gave to him<br />
<b>**This excerpt is taken from John Piper's mini biography on David Brainerd</b><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> Brainerd struggled to love the Indians.</b></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">If love is known by sacrifice, then Brainerd loved.</span> But if it is also known by heartfelt compassion then Brainerd struggled to love more than he did. Sometimes he was melted with love.<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjw7CfrD4zaC7uiP-Dejx3-bC7E_yv7gi5E__yiHDTHfnxV9WO2HBEXOK2rGQuZ-Han0SHkBkhAinQqQkXvRRkyEMtNH0i1ujbt665kE5js7zG1n8c7tbF1e5j6qDu7CQ9_ASNjRj7H8hzh/s1600/Indians.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="267" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjw7CfrD4zaC7uiP-Dejx3-bC7E_yv7gi5E__yiHDTHfnxV9WO2HBEXOK2rGQuZ-Han0SHkBkhAinQqQkXvRRkyEMtNH0i1ujbt665kE5js7zG1n8c7tbF1e5j6qDu7CQ9_ASNjRj7H8hzh/s400/Indians.jpg" width="400" /></a></blockquote>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
September 18, 1742:</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Felt some compassion for souls, and mourned I had no more. I feel much more kindness, meekness, gentleness and love towards all mankind, than ever (181).</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
December 26, 1742: </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Felt much sweetness and tenderness in prayer, especially my whole soul seemed to love my worst enemies, and was enabled to pray for those that are strangers and enemies to God with a great degree of softness and pathetic fervor (193).</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Tuesday, July 2, 1745: </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Felt my heat drawn out after God in prayer, almost all the forenoon; especially while riding. And in the evening, could not help crying to God for those poor Indians; and after I went to bed my heart continued to go out to God for them, till I dropped asleep.<br />
Oh, ‘Blessed be God that I may pray!’ (302).</blockquote>
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;">But other times he seemed empty of affection or compassion for their souls.</span> He expresses guilt that he should preach to immortal souls with no more ardency and so little desire for their salvation (235). His compassion could simply go flat.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
November 2, 1744: </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
About noon, rode up to the Indians; and while going, could feel no desires for them, and even dreaded to say anything to ‘em (272).</blockquote>
<br />
So Brainerd struggled with the rise and fall of love in his own heart. He loved, but longed to love so much more.<br />
<br />
To read the rest of Piper's biography, click on the link below.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.desiringgod.org/resource-library/books/david-brainerd">http://www.desiringgod.org/resource-library/books/david-brainerd</a><br />
<br />Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-83690151125359097672012-11-21T05:23:00.001-08:002012-11-21T05:23:27.397-08:00<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiR7JZOzBBYHsolQZaf7o-SIRvERGGljUKR-zcSF-sn9UoC9KOaacYYcWTbhoGWcvNpO9tn9UcvhqJGYAvk8qvv1xFob3Y6dv5VG14ZVFw2zVtji7vAkmhj3W0p6Sp9I2hG3DVg1uUDRF_Z/s1600/The+midweek+mentor.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiR7JZOzBBYHsolQZaf7o-SIRvERGGljUKR-zcSF-sn9UoC9KOaacYYcWTbhoGWcvNpO9tn9UcvhqJGYAvk8qvv1xFob3Y6dv5VG14ZVFw2zVtji7vAkmhj3W0p6Sp9I2hG3DVg1uUDRF_Z/s1600/The+midweek+mentor.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>David Brainerd Quotes: </b><br /><br /></span><blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">"I bless God for this retirement: I never was more thankful for any thing than I have been of late for the necessity I am under of self-denial in many respects."</span></blockquote>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span><blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">"The all-seeing eye of God beheld our deplorable state; infinite pity touched the heart of the Father of mercies; and infinite wisdom laid the plan of our recovery."</span></blockquote>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span><blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">"Once more, Never think that you can live to God by your own power or strength; but always look to and rely on him for assistance, yea, for all strength and grace."</span></blockquote>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span><blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">"I love to live on the brink of eternity."</span></blockquote>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span><blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">"Be careful to make a good improvement of precious time."</span></blockquote>
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-49698798778916542852012-11-20T05:58:00.002-08:002012-11-20T05:58:19.937-08:00David Brainerd—A man who didn’t take care of himself David Brainerd died at the young age of 29. Early death in itself is not unusual, but might the young missionaries’ death been preventable?<br /><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqkpc_KWXm6Pn8XkmYcHYnl9u089J9zMGXA6297z4xxgn0eqtUXjuxy6UIcBKsme7oGCCRZySEYsP5MygUdnlBqmMz099GSozuvxhncF1ySofYDvON6uKk5Y7q71qQCE4q0bfTOwzz9Tar/s1600/tired.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="135" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqkpc_KWXm6Pn8XkmYcHYnl9u089J9zMGXA6297z4xxgn0eqtUXjuxy6UIcBKsme7oGCCRZySEYsP5MygUdnlBqmMz099GSozuvxhncF1ySofYDvON6uKk5Y7q71qQCE4q0bfTOwzz9Tar/s320/tired.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
Jonathan Edwards (author of Brainerd’s diary) explains,<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Another imperfection in Mr. Brainerd, which may be observed in the following account of his life, was his life, was his being excessive in his labors; not taking due care to proportion his fatigues to his strength.”</blockquote>
Yet I would encourage the reader to not be too critical of Brainerd’s imperfection. I believe there are three reasons for Brainerd’s recklessness.
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">Life was short at that time. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I have dealt with this issue in a previous post, addressing the
grim realities for John Calvin and most humans in the last two millennia. </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“It is hard for the 21st century Christian to truly grasp
the regularity of death for the 16th century person. Most children did not make
it to adulthood (Calvin’s only son died two weeks after birth) and therefore,
time for Calvin <i>was against him and never
for him</i>. </blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Calvin discusses his morbid outlook: </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Embark upon a ship, <i>you
are one step from death</i>. Mount a horse, if your foot slips, <i>your life is imperiled</i>. Go through the
city streets, you are subject to as many dangers as there are tiles on the
roofs. But if you try to shut yourself up in a walled garden, seemingly
delightful, there is a serpent lies hidden. Amid these tribulations must not
man be more miserable, since, but half alive in life, he weakly draws his
anxious and languid breath, as if he had a sword perpetually hanging over his
neck.”</blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
(To read the rest of this post, click here: <a href="http://cpletter.blogspot.com/2012/03/john-calvina-man-of-great-discipline.html">http://cpletter.blogspot.com/2012/03/john-calvina-man-of-great-discipline.html</a>)
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The existence for Brainerd was no different. Time was not on
his side so the sense of urgency was more acute. Why take care of yourself, if
by providential means, a plague sweeps through the next day and kills ¾ of your
town? For the 18<sup>th</sup> century Christian, resting because of illness is
often just viewed as possibly wasting the last few days of your earthly journey.
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">He was single. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
A man with no wife or children tends to run harder since he
is an undivided man. Monetary provision does not weigh him down nor the burden
of physical protection his earthly brood. Like a modern day thrill seeker, Brainerd
chose to live fearless and to some degree, reckless. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">Heaven was inviting. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Do you (and I) really believe the familiar words, “To live
in Christ and to die is gain.” (Phil. 1:21)? Without a doubt, Brainerd did. Not
only did he believe it but he longed for the relief and perfect communion found
inside the gates of Heaven. Therefore, death for Brainerd was an enemy, but not
an enemy to be feared or avoided. In other words, why fear death when it simply
leads you to your inheritance? </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Let’s ask an important question: So why did Edwards (and
Brainerd himself) view this as an “imperfection”? Or better yet, “How can we
avoid this error”? </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The answer to the first question is difficult to pinpoint.
Brainerd’s ministry to the Indians was inherently harsh and difficult. Food was
sometimes scarce, which only weakened his frail disposition. But Brainerd also neglected
to listen to his body, the Holy Spirit and human counselors who encouraged him
to take seriously his limitation </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
But what about us? </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;">Principle #1—Check the motives of YOUR heart. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
To begin with this principle is essential. <span style="font-size: x-large;">Most American
Christians won’t struggle like Brainerd. Pushing the boundaries of human limits
is rare today in our lazy, self-indulgent, medicated society.</span> Yet those individuals
are not “off the hook”, but in actuality are in need of the same spiritual EKG (as
the nobly reckless) to diagnose the idols of their idle, self-focused heart. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;">Principle #2—Working long doesn’t always produce effective
results. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Even the most robust of our kind need rest. For example, I
am writing this blog post at 4:30 AM, rather than at 9 PM, because I am more
alert after 6 hours of uninterrupted sleep. Anxiety and pride keeps a man (or
woman) working past their human limit. Ecclesiastes 5:12states that ‘sleep is
pleasant for the one who works’, but unless the person can mentally shut it down,
this proverb misses its divine intent. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;">Principle #3—Don’t be a Martha, be a Mary. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Here is the enigmatic part of Brainerd; clearly his journal showed
he was like Mary (Luke 10:39). Day after day he sat at the feet of Jesus. Is it
possible to be alone with God but still be a Martha? I think so. The Puritan ideal
at times seems Martha-ish, rather than Mary-ish. Examine, memorize, confess,
meditate, sing, pray. Examine, memorize, meditate, sing, pray. Sounds
exhausting, doesn’t it? For the David Brainerd’s of the 21<sup>st</sup> century
it would behoove you to remember that busyness, whether spiritual or physical, can
subtly become soul-taxing rather than soul-stimulating. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;">Principle #4—Temptations are more intense when you are weak,
stressed or sleep-deprived. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The typically rebuttal to this principle is that God is faithful
and will not give any Christian more than he or she can handle (I Cor. 10:13).
No doubt this is true, but if we neglect the natural, providential or brotherly
warning signals, then has God failed or have we? Is not our holiness worth a spiritual
EKG exam? </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;">Principle #5—God wants you to enjoy life and His creation. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I am a grinder. This fact is self-evident to those who know
me or those who have worked with me. In the plan of God, superior intelligence was
divinely withheld from me, but human persistence was not. The result: I see the
trees, but rarely the forest. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Someone once told me there is a difference between laziness
and enjoying your labor (Ecc. 3:13). To be clear, I am not advocating the
modern maxim of “work hard, play hard”. This is often used as a justification
for excess, not balance. But seriously, how do we enjoy life and His creation?
Is the answer simply a 3-week vacation or a larger retirement account? </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Again, stopping or slowing is not necessary slothfulness. The
Saints of old regularly took walks (Jonathan Edwards) and planted gardens (John
Calvin, William Carey). More than that, I believe a thankful heart produces in
us a “wow factor” with not just the trees, but also the forest, both of which God
created and upholds by His mighty hand. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: large;">Principle #6—Remember God doesn’t need you (or your wisdom).
</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Lately, a new friend of mine has challenged my thinking on
humanity’s role in God’s drama. Our story purposely intertwined in His story. But
doesn’t this principle violate or at least minimize God’s ordained plan for
humanity? No, I simply think this reminds humanity that God’s ways are not my
ways (Isa. 55:8) and His timing mayresponsibility is not always in tuned with
our perception of time. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
How myopic we often are, especially the type A Christians of
the world? We think, “The gospel must be proclaimed, therefore, we ought to be constantly
moving, right?” Wrong! Paul had great evangelistic success in prison during his
2.5 years in Rome. The first generation of Christian slaves must have thought, “We
need to be free to be about the ministry of the gospel, right?” Wrong! Paul
clearly states to stay in the condition in which you were called (1 Cor. 7:22).
My point is that the mission includes rest and enjoyment, not the exclusion of it. What if the rest you need allows someone to serve you or provides you an opportunity for the gospel unbeknownst to you? </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<span style="font-size: large;">Principle #7—Some people have weaker dispositions whether physical, mental or emotional. </span>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
There is no question Brainerd was physically fragile but
apparently, he was even weaker on an emotional level. This specific deficiency,
I will address in the next blog post. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Though Brainerd didn’t listen to his body, let us listen to
our own. For example, my wife requires 8 hours of sleep or she is….well…a
little off. Does her neglect of required sleep give her license to sin (i.e.
grumpiness)? Of course not, but knowledge of her body is part of our earthly stewardship
and required to properly live under the Lordship of Jesus Christ. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
In other words, some people are physically frail, some are
prone to bouts of depression and some are trapped in the noise of their busy
mind. Let us be militant to identify, plan and seek help and accountability for our frailties
within the God-ordained means of the fellowship of the saints, which is specifically
manifested in the local church. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-56996719693325388802012-11-16T06:03:00.001-08:002012-11-16T11:46:11.886-08:00Book Review: Man Alive <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRlgliqz9SBJVBg42zbTIK9LiZiCuBHs7fWS3rosjx_QEWZyEJqB65SY7HbHd-asnjn1e6OLJLlbT58vlyVKQo2hdr6kRWzV5fVW1iOsNl5ENM9gUgd2fV9g9MPSFySj8TaRTJZZoNnZPV/s1600/Man-Alive.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRlgliqz9SBJVBg42zbTIK9LiZiCuBHs7fWS3rosjx_QEWZyEJqB65SY7HbHd-asnjn1e6OLJLlbT58vlyVKQo2hdr6kRWzV5fVW1iOsNl5ENM9gUgd2fV9g9MPSFySj8TaRTJZZoNnZPV/s200/Man-Alive.jpg" width="129" /></a><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
The author of <i>Man Alive </i>is a smart guy. Dr. Morley graduated from
Harvard, Oxford and completed a stint at Reformed Theological Seminary. Yet he
is better known for the ministry he created, <i>The Man in the Mirror</i>, which strategically focuses on biblical
masculinity. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
He begins this book with one of his many inspiring stories,
directing the reader to his thesis statement: <i>Every man has seven primal, instinctive needs</i> (each need is
unpacked within a specific chapter). Morley believes that most men they lead
“lukewarm, stagnant, often defeated lives”. Because these <i>primal</i> needs are neglected, men default into physical isolation and
spiritual indifference. This book grandly proclaims that it will bring hope,
healing and practical help for such a man. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I am pleased to state that Dr. Morley succeeds in his
literary purpose. Each chapter is embedded with sagely advice and anecdotal offerings.
In addition, each of the seven primal needs are addressed with levity and simplistic
language. It is clear that the author is sensitive to his audience and seeks to
walk with the reader, rather than bark instructions from the sideline. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
An example of this is found in chapter four, <i>Created for a Life of Purpose</i>. Morley
states that men have a primal need to “believe that my life has a purpose and
that my life is not random”. To elucidate his point, the author draws from his
experience as a successful businessman. Yet after the euphoria of success wore
off, he was miserable. Broken and humbled, God graciously revealed his Big Holy
Audacious Goal (BHAG, as Morley calls it): It is for <i>My children to become My disciples</i>. The integration of the big Story
and Morley’s story is compelling with obvious implications for the reader. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Lastly, chapter two is worth the price of the book. Through anecdotes
and focused orthopraxy, the author unpacks the profound truth ‘that you and I
are wired by God with an instinct to be in authentic relationships’. In other
words, isolation is bad and community is good. Excellent, practical stuff. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b>Criticism</b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I am little surprised at the way the author use of certain
biblical texts. In chapter one, Morley endeavors to show the difference between
a successful Christian and an unsuccessful Christian. He points the reader to
The Parable of the Soils (Matthew 13) and states,</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Most men today would recognize themselves in the first
three soils, where the seeds don’t grow. Yet they honestly want to be like the
good soil…..What is keeping men’s lives hard, rocky, and choked with thorns
when so many urgently want more and when God created us for more—much more?” (p.10)</blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The problem with Morley’s use of this passage is that the
three seeds symbolize false or undetermined faith, not <i>explicitly </i>weak or stunted faith. In other words, Jesus doesn’t
comment of spiritual position of the three seeds. Some will prove to have
embraced self-deception, bearers of the bad fruit. To give no warning to the
readers of their possible self-deception is an unfortunate omission. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
But a more tragic example of this is Morley’s use of the Sadducees
in Matthew 22 to buttress his point. He states, </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Jesus gave us an insight when He was speaking to a group of
confused religious men. He said, “Your mistake is that you don’t know the
Scriptures, and you don’t know the power of God. (Matthew 22:29). Do you see
it? Jesus made a direct connection between knowing the Bible and leading a
powerful life.” (p.11)</blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Now I strongly applaud the author’s emphasis on the priority
of “knowing the scriptures” and drawing the connection that this spiritual
discipline will produce a life of power. This is certainly a biblical concept.
Yet to use a Sadducee as an example is reckless. The Sadducees were a group of
religious elite who <i>denied the concept of
resurrection</i>. Matthew repeatedly put the Pharisees and Sadducees in the
same group and denounced them both (Matt. 16:6). Again, to call them anything
other than spiritually dead and blind is to ignore the plain implications of
the text. Yet the baffling part is that later in the book Dr. Morley acknowledges
the dangers of easy believism and cautions his readers. </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“But there is a caution. Receiving Jesus, having your sins
forgiven, and receiving the gift of eternal life is easy, but only if it’s
sincere.” (p. 58) </blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Overall, <i>Man Alive</i>
is a worthy contributor to the genre of biblical masculinity. I would encourage
the use of this book in a small group dialogue (with a discerning leader) or as
a gift to a spiritually indifferent man. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-9347109614612996782012-11-14T05:18:00.000-08:002012-11-14T05:18:18.738-08:00<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwmdkaokPFnY2J-Kq818DWGyDetGNq3xLkYh9E4zG35Y_3KqRX0pVaKPD3c4CIaQOZ3Z2oxph_RCISxaIwg-u7b16XkbiWhjb5X2w7V-_wKY0N5PkDhOs2WmJlO2nz-QrA8Qvmr5-4P1cI/s1600/The+midweek+mentor.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwmdkaokPFnY2J-Kq818DWGyDetGNq3xLkYh9E4zG35Y_3KqRX0pVaKPD3c4CIaQOZ3Z2oxph_RCISxaIwg-u7b16XkbiWhjb5X2w7V-_wKY0N5PkDhOs2WmJlO2nz-QrA8Qvmr5-4P1cI/s1600/The+midweek+mentor.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<b><span style="font-size: x-large;">David Brainerd Quotes:</span></b><br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">"All my desire was the conversion of the heathen... I declare, now I am dying, I would not have spent my life otherwise for the whole world." </span></blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">"First, Resolve upon, and daily endeavour to practise, a life of seriousness and strict sobriety." </span></blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">"If you hope for happiness in the world, hope for it from God, and not from the world." </span></blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: x-large;">"I care not where I go, or how I live, or what I endure so that I may save souls. When I sleep I dream of them; when I awake they are first in my thoughts." </span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-78319413039591777192012-11-11T14:55:00.001-08:002012-11-11T15:16:35.424-08:00David Brainerd—A man who thought often about sin<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
In reading <i>The Life
and Diary of David Brainerd</i>, I observed that Brainerd wrote often about his
daily, personal struggle with sin.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTkUtrtbYgrgoaQDg9kegR9BaPeQsSquTg1DKon6cgij1IkoZt92MUtJxJzTxa6ye1oav4AUqyeahwtmpZp_J25Y0E1RUCcYlUxE5338R7vwjlYWh5Ah84NM4DjIgcAPLdZQHDFqKm8dTq/s1600/hating+sin2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTkUtrtbYgrgoaQDg9kegR9BaPeQsSquTg1DKon6cgij1IkoZt92MUtJxJzTxa6ye1oav4AUqyeahwtmpZp_J25Y0E1RUCcYlUxE5338R7vwjlYWh5Ah84NM4DjIgcAPLdZQHDFqKm8dTq/s1600/hating+sin2.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Here are three examples of his sin-focused entries:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Lord's day, June 13: </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Felt something calm and resigned in the public worship: at
the sacrament saw myself very vile and worthless. O that I may always lie low
in the dust. My soul seemed steadily to go forth after God, in longing desires
to live upon him.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Thursday, May 13: </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Saw so much of the wickedness of my heart, that I longed to
get away from myself. I never before thought there was so much spiritual pride
in my soul. I felt almost pressed to death with my own vileness. Oh what a body
of death is there in me! Lord, deliver my soul. I could not find any convenient
place for retirement, and was greatly exercised.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Lord's day, May 2:</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
God was pleased this morning to give me such a sight of
myself, as made me appear very vile in my own eyes. I felt corruption stirring
in my heart, which I could by no means suppress; felt more and more deserted;
was exceeding weak, and almost sick with my inward trials.</blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
A little morbid, isn’t it?</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Ah, but maybe these entries were rare in the diary of
Brainerd? I mean, doesn’t Edwards himself say Brainerd struggled with
depression? Come on, isn’t everyone allowed to have a bad day, here and there? </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br />
In response to the question above, the opposite was true
regarding the young missionaries’ diary. The majority of the entries dealt at
some length with the corrosive effects of his personal sin. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Of course, <span style="font-size: x-large;">let us be quick to applaud Brainerd for at least
examining his own heart, rather the sins of others, which seems to be a
besetting transgression for many Christians. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The issue for me is this: <span style="font-size: large;"><i>Is it normal to think this much about our sin? </i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b>What Brainerd got right: </b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>Right:</b> </span><span style="font-size: large;">The hatred of sin reveals a fear of God. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
A sense of your own unworthiness comes from the knowledge of
God. To see Him more clearly means to see ourselves more clearly. </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-language: HE;">Proverbs 8:13</span></b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-language: HE;"> The fear of the LORD is hatred of evil. Pride and
arrogance and the way of evil and perverted speech I hate.<o:p></o:p></span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Furthermore, we must remember that this hatred of evil
begins first by hating the evil inside you. This hate grows with the concurrent
growth of loving God and also loving what God loves. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The classic example of what great hate and great love looks
like is found in the person of Phinehas. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The context was this: Israel has joined themselves to Baal,
God became angry and sent a plague. During this idolatry, a leader of Israel
brought a foreign woman back to his tent. Phinehas didn’t like that. </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-language: HE;">Numbers 25:7</span></b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-language: HE;"> When Phinehas the son of Eleazar, son of Aaron the
priest, saw it, he rose and left the congregation and took a spear in his hand <sup>8</sup>
and went after the man of Israel into the chamber and pierced both of them, the
man of Israel and the woman through her belly. Thus the plague on the people of
Israel was stopped.</span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-bidi-language: HE;">This is right out of a scene in the movie Braveheart. Anyways, look at
God’s words.</span></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-language: HE;">Numbers 25:11</span></b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-language: HE;"> "Phinehas the son of Eleazar, son of Aaron the
priest, has turned back my wrath from the people of Israel, <i><u>in that he was jealous with my jealousy
among them</u></i>, so that I did not consume the people of Israel in my
jealousy.</span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Phinehas was consumed with jealousy for God and His glory. He hated sin
because it offended God. He loved God and cared about what He cares about. I
believe many (though not all) of Brainerd’s entries reflected this type of
hatred of his sin.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-size: x-large;">Right:</span> </b><span style="font-size: large;">The road to holiness
deals with sin. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
David Brainerd was a holy
man. Not perfect, of course, but the fruits of his holiness were obvious to
those who walked with him. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Is simply “hating sin” the
way to become holy? No, but scripture puts great emphasis on it. </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-language: HE;">2 Corinthians 7:1</span></b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-language: HE;"> Since we have
these promises, beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from every defilement of body
and spirit, <i><u>bringing holiness to
completion in the fear of God</u></i>.<o:p></o:p></span></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-language: HE;">Hebrews 12:10</span></b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-language: HE;"> For they disciplined
us for a short time as it seemed best to them, but he disciplines us for our
good, <i><u>that we may share his holiness</u></i>.<o:p></o:p></span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Paul says in 2 Corinthians that defilement hinders the
journey to holiness. The author of Hebrews makes it clear that sharing in Christ’s
holiness requires fatherly discipline. Fathers discipline their children when
their sinful actions obstruct the path to becoming like Christ. And yet active purging
of sin only increases your holiness when it is accompanied by active pursuing
of the fruits of the Spirit. Throwing out your television, burning your
records, washing your mouth with soap does not produce holiness without the
renewing of your mind. <span style="font-size: x-large;">Idols can be destroyed, but destroying idolatry is much
more difficult. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Brainerd was holy because he battled with his sin. He strove
to never give up any ground to the enemy. His militancy pleased the Holy One of
Heaven. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-size: x-large;">Right:</span></b><span style="font-size: large;"> Grace is cherished when
sin is seen as vile. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Brainerd saw both the
vileness of his sin and the unspeakable grace of God. The smell of sin still
captured his affections and he was overwhelmed that God would place His love on
such a wretched sinner. He studied his sin in such detail that he saw the grace
of God differently. He saw grace like a poor Haitian child (or any child from a poverty-stricken country) looks at a Christmas
gift….with pure shock and amazement. </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-language: HE;">James 4:6-8</span></b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-language: HE;"> But he gives more
grace. Therefore it says, "God opposes the proud, but gives grace to the
humble." <sup>7</sup> Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the
devil, and he will flee from you. <sup>8</sup> Draw near to God, and he will
draw near to you. Cleanse your hands, you sinners, and purify your hearts, you
double-minded.<o:p></o:p></span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-language: HE;">Only
a deep, disturbed knowledge of sin brings this understanding of grace.
Indifference towards our sin is rampant in areas with minimal suffering and coexisting
comfort. Also, local churches that preach sin-silent sermons are undoubtedly
churches that preach gospel-silent or gospel-light sermons. Nominal Christianity
is the progeny of such churches. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b>What Brainerd got wrong: </b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-size: x-large;">Wrong:</span></b><span style="font-size: large;"> Too much
introspection is harmful for your spiritual health. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Puritans are often accused
of this: They were really, really, really hard on themselves. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Is this accurate? I think
for many Puritans it was. Yet life was different then. It was hard, brief and
death could come at any moment. Most families had 4-6 children die in infancy.
Plagues ravaged towns. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Also, the doctrine of
predestination was taught in many pulpits during that era. People often asked,
“Am I one of God’s elect?” Pastors advised concerned congregants to examine
their fruit and their heart affections. This advice led naturally to deep,
personal introspection. Every thought, every motive, every action was
scrupulously examined. It is in this era the great David Brainerd lived. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Personally, I believe this
is <i>part of the reason</i> why Brainerd
struggled with bouts of depression (but I will write on this topic at a later
time). </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
To be clear, some
introspection is good, necessary and biblical. </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-language: HE;">2 Corinthians 13:5</span></b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-language: HE;"> Examine
yourselves, to see whether you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Or do you not
realize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you?- unless indeed you
fail to meet the test!<o:p></o:p></span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
So, test yourself. Ask
others to assess your spirituality. Pray that God reveals to you the
pervasiveness of your sin. Small portions of this are necessary to become like
Christ (Rom. 8:29). <span style="font-size: x-large;">Excessive reflection is idolatry. Your sanctification
becomes the idol. </span>Mind you, this type of idolatry is rare (in my opinion), but
if the heart is a factory of idolatry (as Calvin says), then each heart molds
different idols since each heart belongs to a uniquely created person. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
If I was counseling Brainerd
(a humbling thought, indeed), I would encourage him <i>to connect his mission to
his sanctification. </i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Ummm…isn’t this
self-evident….he was a missionary who intensely desired to be holy, wasn’t he?
Yes, but this is always an important question to ask. We are commanded to be
missionaries, global or local, but we often get distracted. We forget we are a
part of God’s drama, on the grandest level, acting (i.e. participating) for an
audience of One. Yet we tend to focus on our drama, in a little community
center, with only our idols in the audience. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I think Brainerd neglected
to consider that his mission was part of his sanctification. Practically, I am
not sure the hours of meditation and isolated prayer was good for a man with
this type of disposition. I have come to realize that in the same way that God
uses marriage to sanctify us, He uses our mission to help His children focus on
others (Phil. 2:1-11) and live out the law of Christ (Gal. 6:2). </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Lastly, I would communicate
to Brainerd (and myself, since I am prone to unhealthy introspection), the profound
words of Robert Murray McCheyne: </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"For every look at self, take ten looks at
Christ."</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Amen. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-7328679572486383482012-11-09T00:25:00.004-08:002012-11-09T00:31:03.495-08:00David Brainerd—A man who kept a journal<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
It might surprise you that the journal of David Brainerd has
encouraged hundreds of thousands of Christians and missionaries over the last 250
years. Though he never intended it to be read by anyone, Jonathan Edwards gave
a gift to Christendom by publishing his experiences, his hurts, his sorrows and
his victories. In other words, Brainerd’s journal resonated with fellow
Christians because is a brutally honest account of his journey to the Celestial
City.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Brainerd was a man of great highs and great lows. In future blog
posts, I will examine with more exactness his bouts of melancholy, but here I wanted to simply
show some examples of his legendary journal. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_iBuYSOpI32JmeLcU1kK1MEh4R0FE15teLzXM7XOwTx36FCp7-FeRAlPBLttRvMCq2nb5Et8cjuN5LVg02nO3yBKPm0T4P5KKKxGeDa5Bqc5pTSrYYY2hTXqcvNwze3owBNZFe-VdyhH7/s1600/journal2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_iBuYSOpI32JmeLcU1kK1MEh4R0FE15teLzXM7XOwTx36FCp7-FeRAlPBLttRvMCq2nb5Et8cjuN5LVg02nO3yBKPm0T4P5KKKxGeDa5Bqc5pTSrYYY2hTXqcvNwze3owBNZFe-VdyhH7/s1600/journal2.jpg" /></a>Wednesday, May 18. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“My circumstances are such, that I have no comfort, of any
kind, but what I have in God. <span style="font-size: x-large;">I live in the most lonesome wilderness; have but
one single person to converse with, that can speak English.</span> Most of the talk I
hear, is either Highland Scotch or Indian. I have no fellow-Christian to whom I
might unbosom myself, or lay open my spiritual sorrows; with whom I might take
sweet counsel in conversation about heavenly things, and join in social prayer.
I live poorly with regard to the comforts of life: most of my diet consists of
boiled corn, hasty-pudding, &c. I lodge on a bundle of straw, my labour is
hard and extremely difficult, and I have little appearance of success to
comfort me.”</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Lord's day, Dec. 26. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Felt much sweetness and tenderness in prayer, especially my
whole soul seemed to love my worst enemies, and was enabled to pray for those
that are strangers and enemies to God with a great degree of softness and fervor.”
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Wednesday, Aug. 18. </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Spent most of this day in prayer and reading. -- I see so
much of my own extreme vileness, that I feel ashamed and guilty before God and
man; <span style="font-size: x-large;">I look to myself like the vilest fellow in the land: I wonder that God
stirs up his people to be so kind to me.” </span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
These three entries reveal the spectrum of Brainerd’s
affections, which are parallel to many Christians today. Now admittedly, the degree
of commitment or godliness vary in every man or woman, but within the “missionary
to the Indians” we see his heart and therefore, we see into our heart and sometimes we see a glimpse of what dwells in God’s heart. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Do you journal? Need some reasons to give it a try? </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Michael Hyatt, a New York Times best-seller, leadership guru and Christian writer, shares a few practical benefits of journaling: </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Clarify my thinking.</span></b> Writing
in general helps me disentangle my thoughts. Journaling takes it to a new
level. Because I am not performing in front of a “live audience,” so to speak,
I can really wrestle through the issues.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Ask important questions.</span></b> A
journal is not merely a repository for the lessons I am learning but also the
questions I’m asking. If there’s one thing I have discovered, it’s the quality
of my questions determine the quality of my answers.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-size: 14.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Connect with my heart.</span></b> I’m
not sure I can really explain this one, but journaling has helped me monitor
the condition of my heart. Solomon said “above all else” we are to guard it
(see Proverbs 4:23). It’s hard to do that when you lose touch with it.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
To read the rest of Michael’s excellent post, just click the
link below: </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<a href="http://michaelhyatt.com/daily-journal.html">http://michaelhyatt.com/daily-journal.html</a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-23486302983932759742012-11-04T20:49:00.000-08:002012-11-05T15:53:43.151-08:00Book Review: Organic Outreach for Families<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjk583REFflUnaQt3SQZaea5YSlTvo_AcNTZD7C5s8H5oMjIbmZ2TWFrbngvm00233HeASXdSUiBch0P5WkMs-JlxVRpMv8DfOOOHFXgIF2fTKHuyXh3hF-3ELFI2UAweLq11ItiMoEc-YV/s1600/organic+outreach.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjk583REFflUnaQt3SQZaea5YSlTvo_AcNTZD7C5s8H5oMjIbmZ2TWFrbngvm00233HeASXdSUiBch0P5WkMs-JlxVRpMv8DfOOOHFXgIF2fTKHuyXh3hF-3ELFI2UAweLq11ItiMoEc-YV/s1600/organic+outreach.jpeg" style="cursor: move;" /></a><i>Organic Outreach for Families: Turning Your Home into a Lighthouse</i> is the last book of the trilogy written by Kevin and Sherry Harney. This reviewer had not heard of nor previously read any of Pastor Harney’s works, so my review is without bias or agenda.<br />
<br />
In the introduction, the authors are helpful is sketching out the book’s direction, which is challenging Christian families to pursue gospel moments through the use of their home in a natural, organic and relational way. Part one focuses on helping parents reach their children and extended family with the love of the gospel in practical ways. In part two, the Harney’s share their life experiences and proven methods of how they encouraged their kids to live out the Great Commission. Finally, the last section of the book focuses on the home itself: how to build a lighthouse, how to make it shine and how to avoid the dimming or covering of its light. <br />
<br />
One of my first impressions of the book is that <i>it is an easy read</i>. The generous use of personal anecdotes and minimal theological terminology is perfect for newer Christians or those with an aversion to technical or complex argumentation. <br />
<br />
Another factor that adds to the broad marketability of the book is its emphasis on <i>the practical, not the theoretical.</i> Most of the chapters offer bullet points of sensible advice, clearly drawn from years in the trenches of pastoral ministry. An excellent example of this is chapter seven: The Home as a Playground, where Sherry Harney, under the subtitle <i>The Pathway to Fun</i>, offers nine lessons ranging from #3—Say Yes Whenever You Can, #5—Slow Down or #8—Set Boundaries (my personal favorite). These lessons are strategically universal and ready for immediate implementation. <br />
<br />
One of the unexpected joys of this book is the author’s commitment to <i>eclectic evangelism</i>. If there is any consistent methodology found in this work, it is the consistent dispersion of the Harney’s personal testimony. No <i>Evangelism Explosion</i>, <i>Way of the Master</i> or any other recent (or antiquated) evangelism technique is promoted or even mentioned. To this reviewer, I found this emphasis immensely practical and reinforced my conviction that most Christians don’t need a memorized system, just a little faith and a commitment to the mission. <br />
<br />
The other unexpected joy is the special sections or "grey areas" within each chapter. These areas function to bring additional perspectives (mainly from the Harney's boys) or to elucidate important concepts such as the gospel, sin or forgiveness. In my opinion, these "grey areas" infused some much needed theological depth, which may give it more shelf life as a viable resource for the local church.<br />
<br />
I do have one criticism, though. <br />
<br />
The authors seem to have a subtle bent towards philosophical pragmatism. <br />
<br />
On page 60 Pastor Harney writes, <br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
“I was speaking to a woman in my family who had been investigating the Christian faith…for 25 years. This particular family member has a passion for music. Music touches her soul in a way that is deep and true to who she is, so over the years I gave her great Christian music. She loved it…..and eventually began attending a wonderful church near her home, and she joined the choir. She was not yet a follower of Jesus, but she loved singing and connecting with the other choir members, and they lovingly welcomed her.”</blockquote>
He goes on to write that at a later time she heard the gospel and responded in faith to the saving work of Jesus. <br />
<br />
To be clear, I am thankful this lady gave her life to Christ, but as the saying goes, “The end doesn’t justify the means.” In my opinion, this approach is just as foolish as “missionary dating” and as inappropriate as putting a new convert in a position of church leadership (I Tim. 3:6). Innovation and risk-taking (p. 171) does not trump the priority of spirit-filled and truth-driven worship (John 4:24).<br />
<br />
<b>Conclusion</b><br />
<br />
Overall, I endorse this entertaining, well-written book. It made me look within myself and ask these questions, "Am I really about outreach in my neighborhood?", "Am I balanced in my parenting approach?", "Is selfishness hindering me from being more involved in my community?" As I stated above, this will be a helpful resource to those new to the Christian faith and those who need some practical guidance of how to live “in the world”, but not “of the world”. <br />
<br />
**Thank you to Zondervan and Cross Focused Reviews for providing me a copy of this book in exchange for this review.<br />
<br />Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-8815695243681304082012-11-02T06:15:00.004-07:002012-11-02T06:15:44.110-07:00David Brainerd—A man who got expelled from college Unfortunately, we do not know much about the younger years of Mr. Brainerd except this account, which is firmly established in church history lore. <div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhu4xYacN5u4xZSqmIA_Bu397-m17WuQrFawu0Wx_daIHCIouhei8BaT9t6vTAnBsj0xokPRB45KgYdvvaamf9P8YIi66idArg9p85KLMNxtV9NhZmFhyKZojYhGNC5Q3d9uEAqhZRvFkfZ/s1600/kicked+out.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhu4xYacN5u4xZSqmIA_Bu397-m17WuQrFawu0Wx_daIHCIouhei8BaT9t6vTAnBsj0xokPRB45KgYdvvaamf9P8YIi66idArg9p85KLMNxtV9NhZmFhyKZojYhGNC5Q3d9uEAqhZRvFkfZ/s1600/kicked+out.jpg" /></a>“And it once happened, that he and two or three more of these intimate friends were in the hall together, after Mr. Whittelsey, one of the tutors, had been to prayer there with the scholars; no other person now remaining in the hall but Brainerd and his companions. Mr. Whittelsey having been unusually pathetic in his prayer, one of Brainerd’s friends on this occasion asked him what he thought of Mr. Whittelsey; he made answer, “He has no more grace that this chair”. One of the freshman happening at that time to be near the have (though not in the room) over-heard those words. This person, though he heard no name mentioned, and knew not who was thus censured, informed a certain woman in the town, withal telling her his own suspicion, that he believed Brainerd said this of someone or another of the rulers of the college. Whereupon she went and informed the rector, who sent for this freshman and examined him. He told the rector the words he heard Brainerd utter, and informed him who was in the room with him at that time. Upon which the rector sent for them; they were very backward to inform against their friend that they looked upon as private conversation, and especially as …..Brainerd looked on himself very ill used in the management of this affair; and thought, that it was injuriously required of him—as if he had been guilty of some open, notorious crime—to make a public confession, and to humble himself before the whole college in the hall, for what he had said only in private conversation. He was not complying with this demand, and having gone once to the separate meeting at New Haven, when forbidden by the rector; and also have been accused by one of saying concerning the rector, “that he wondered he did not drop dead for fining the scholars who followed Mr. Tennent to Milford”, though there was no proof of it; (and Mr. Brainerd ever professed that he did not remember his saying an thing to that purpose;) for these things he was expelled from the college.”</blockquote>
I am not making an assessment of the innocence or guilt of Mr. Brainerd (neither did Edwards in his work), but only to use this unfortunate situation to ask this question, “Why does God judge severely some of His servants, especially those of unique piety and high commitment to the Almighty?” I mean, God in His providence, could have equipped the rector with a little more grace regarding the situation, instead of treating it as a witch hunt. <br /><br />Here are two men in the bible that seemed to have to endure hard (almost unjust) consequences for their sin:<br /><br /><span style="font-size: x-large;">Moses </span><br /><br />Moses was commanded by God to lead His people out of Egypt. Throughout their journeys, he dealt with a stubborn, stiff-necked people. On at least one occasion, Moses pleaded with God to turn His wrath from consuming His people, even asking for his own life to be taken on their behalf. Pretty noble guy, right?<br /><br />Scripture also speaks highly of this great lawgiver: <br /><br />Numbers 12:3 (Now Moses was a very humble man, more humble than anyone else on the face of the earth.) <br /><br />Yet he was a sinner.<br /><br />Here is the account of his tragic sin: <br /><blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>Numbers 20:11-12</b> And Moses lifted up his hand and struck the rock with his staff twice, and water came out abundantly, and the congregation drank, and their livestock. 12 And the LORD said to Moses and Aaron, "<i><u>Because you did not believe in me, to uphold me as holy in the eyes of the people of Israel, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land that I have given them."</u></i></blockquote>
God’s judgment had been forged. I must admit there have been times I question why God’s punishment was so harsh. <span style="font-size: x-large;">To be clear, it wasn’t that Moses was wrong for becoming angry; it was that he did not uphold God as holy in the eyes of the people of Israel. </span><br /><br />Obviously, the holiness of God is important, especially to God Himself. <br /><br /><span style="font-size: x-large;">Uzzah </span><br /><br />Who is Uzzah? Uzzah is one of the “tear down” and “assemble” guys of the Tabernacle. From the little biblical data, he seems to be a good dude. But unfortunately, he committed a fatal error before the Lord, while moving the Ark of the Covenant. <br /><blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>2 Samuel 6:6-8</b> And when they came to the threshing floor of Nacon, Uzzah put out his hand to the ark of God and took hold of it, for the oxen stumbled. 7 And the anger of the LORD was kindled against Uzzah, <u><i>and God struck him down there because of his error, and he died there beside the ark of God.</i></u> 8 And David was angry because the LORD had burst forth against Uzzah. And that place is called Perez-uzzah, to this day.</blockquote>
For many Christians, this judgment seems horrifyingly severe. But was it? <br /><br />In his book, The Holiness of God, R.C. Sproul points out: <br /><blockquote class="tr_bq">
“Uzzah assumed that his hand was less polluted than the earth. But it wasn’t the ground that would desecrate the Ark; it was the touch of man.” Uzzah was a Kohathite, a clan from within the tribe of Levi, which had been consecrated by God to handle the logistics of moving the Tabernacle—the tent and its furnishings. The book of Numbers clearly warns that they may not touch the holy objects “or they will die”. Only the Levitical priests were allowed to carry the most holy objects; the Kohathites were not to even look at the Ark (Num 4).”</blockquote>
God was gracious by not consuming Uzzah for looking at the Ark, but his view of himself synchronized with his blasphemously low view of God, incited the anger of the Almighty. This event prefigured a similar event in Acts 5, which caused ‘great fear came upon the whole church and upon all who heard of these things.’ (Acts 5:11). <br /><br />Here are some thoughts regarding the question, “Why does God judge severely (from a human perspective) some of His servants?” <br /><br /><b>First, God is holy and expects His children to “set Him apart”. </b><br /><br />In both OT examples, these men did not treat God as holy. Modern day Christians seem lax regarding the holiness of God and their own personal holiness (me included). I have often wondered why God doesn’t bring immediate judgment like He did in the days of old. This would wake up an indifferent church. <br /><br /><span style="font-size: x-large;">Let us not think our God is dormant or impotent. He is not tame. His roar is often communicated through his providence, which is mysterious and equally persuasive. </span><br /><br /><b><br /></b><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div>
<b>Second, public leaders often receive greater consequences. </b><br /><br />This is alluded to in the judgment of Moses. His sin demeaned the holiness of God in the sight of the Israelites and subsequently, elevated his position before them. God will NOT share His glory with another.<br /><blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>Luke 12:48</b> But the one who did not know, and did what deserved a beating, will receive a light beating. <u><i>Everyone to whom much was given, of him much will be required</i></u>, and from him to whom they entrusted much, they will demand the more.</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>James 3:1</b> Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, <u><i>for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness.</i></u></blockquote>
Now Brainerd wasn’t a teacher or in any Christian vocation at this point, but his piety and sense of calling had already been established. Maybe the future missionary needed a severe reminder of the undeniable connection of his holiness and his gospel witness. <br /><blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>1 Timothy 4:16</b> Keep a close watch on yourself and on the teaching. Persist in this, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers. </blockquote>
<br /><b>Third, the goal is to become like Jesus. </b><br /><br />It is difficult sometimes to distinguish divine chastening from a divine testing. Most of the time it is clear, but occasionally sin blinds us or a Puritan-like introspection muddies our assessment. Either way, God wants to mold us into an image. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I have often wondered if, when in Heaven, we will get the opportunity to see the portrait of our lives, to see the panoramic view of His providence. Will I get to see why God allowed cancer to eat away my father-in-law at such a young age? Or why my sister and I grew up in an environment of chaos? Or why my mentor abandoned his wife and children, which invoked (within me) an era of spiritual doubt and disillusionment? Yet then I remind myself that with the heavenly purging of indwelling sin, the desire of such curiosities will likely also be removed. <br /><br />The wonderful truth is that I don’t need the Creator of the painting to explain His masterpiece. His divine revelation has already explained the portrait. <br /><blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b>Romans 8:28-29</b> And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. 29 For those whom he foreknew he also predestined <u><i>to be conformed to the image of his Son</i></u>, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.</blockquote>
Even if the Creator stood beside you at His art museum, He would simply say, “My son, the answer was already given. All this was necessary to make you more like my only-begotten Son.” <br /><br />The comforting reality is this: <span style="font-size: x-large;">The Divine surgeon is willing to operate on His children, even if it requires his patients to endure loss, pain and suffering. </span>Make no mistake; this is Fatherly love in the greatest degree. <br /><br /> </div>
</div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-57546981775519566302012-10-21T19:47:00.000-07:002012-10-21T21:15:16.820-07:00Who was David Brainerd? David Brainerd, missionary, born in Haddam, Connecticut, April 20th, 1718; died in Northampton, Massachusetts, October 9th, 1747.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiu-oZcEoFErZhbInfWehmoop48R8Tzrl8FHTmWZr7lRxwIpjUWS-pPAk9t7kwXNHNWMo6iwxyBFbIgj_Oy9qEJrMn56HuHLmTrQ1BfZT2EWGDYMb8LO2ppNCqV-8fFLRSHvRvlLUrmdLHO/s1600/Brainerd+sign.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiu-oZcEoFErZhbInfWehmoop48R8Tzrl8FHTmWZr7lRxwIpjUWS-pPAk9t7kwXNHNWMo6iwxyBFbIgj_Oy9qEJrMn56HuHLmTrQ1BfZT2EWGDYMb8LO2ppNCqV-8fFLRSHvRvlLUrmdLHO/s320/Brainerd+sign.jpg" width="234" /></a><br />
<br />
From early childhood he had strong" religious feeling, and after entering Yale College in 1739, at the time of the great revival under Whitefield, his zeal led him into indiscretions. The' attitude of the College toward the "New Lights" was cold, and students had been forbidden to attend their meetings.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
Brainerd, then in his junior year, disobeyed this rule, and was also heard to say of one of the tutors that he had "no more religion than the chair on which he sat." Refusing to make public confession of these offences in chapel, Brainerd was expelled. He never ceased to regard this action as unjust, though acknowledging that he had been at fault.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
After leaving College he began to study theology, and on July 20th, 1742, was licensed to preach by the Danbury association of ministers. He had for some time been interested in missions, and in the autumn after he was licensed received an appointment from the society for the propagation of Christian knowledge as missionary at the Indian village of Kaunameek, twenty miles from Stock-bridge, Massachusetts.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
He arrived at his post on April 1st, 1743, and labored there for a year, living in a wig-wam and enduring many hardships. After he had persuaded the Indians to move to Stockbridge and place themselves in charge of the minister there, Mr. Brainerd was ordained by the New York presbytery at Newark, New Jersey, and went to the forks of the Delaware, where he remained for about a year, making two visits to the Indians of the Susquehanna, but meeting with little success.</div>
<div>
<br />
He next went to Crossweeksung, near Freehold, New Jersey, where his labor had a wonderful result. In less than a year he had baptized seventy-seven persons, of whom thirty-eight were adults, and the lives of most of these were permanently reformed. In 1747 Brainerd's health, exhausted by his labors, broke down completely. He had never been strong; while he was in College a severe illness had almost ended his life, and after that he suffered from consumption.<br />
<br />
By advice of his physician, he determined to visit his friends in New England. July, 1747, found him in Northampton, Massachusetts, at the house of Jonathan Edwards, to whose daughter he was betrothed, and here he remained till his death.<br />
<br />
Brainerd wrote an account of his labors at Kaunameek, which was published with the sermon delivered at his ordination. His journals, under the titles "Mirabilia Dei apud Indices" and "Divine Grace Displayed," appeared in 1746. His life, compiled chiefly from his diary, was written by Jonathan Edwards (1749), and a second edition, including the journals mentioned above, was edited by Serene Edwards Dwight (New Haven, Connecticut, 1822). J. M. Sherwood edited a third edition, with an introductory essay on Brainerd's life and character (Yew York, 1884). An abridgment, by John Wesley, of Edwards's life, was also published in England (2d American ed., Boston, 1821). See also Sparks's "American Biographies " and Sprague's "Annals of the American Pulpit."<br />
<br />
(This biography was extracted from the public domain). <span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><br /></span>
</div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-68964074876548246602012-10-16T20:27:00.000-07:002012-10-16T23:04:48.281-07:00<div>
Guest blogger: Dr. Matt Farlow</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Dr. Farlow and his family reside in Folsom, CA where he currently serves as the Director and Pastor of Inreach Ministries for Lakeside church. Matt completed a Ph.D. in Theology and Literature at The University of St Andrews. Matt’s doctoral research focused on humanity’s participation in God’s drama of reconciliation. His project investigated God’s imaginative performance in order to make further attempts in realizing the relationship between personhood (being) and how our identity helps to define our role and mission upon the world’s stage.</div>
<div>
<br />
************************************************************************</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"> C.S. Lewis—<i>A man enmeshed in the scandalous nature of </i></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><i> </i><i>the Cross</i></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div>
</div>
Alcohol, suffering, pain, imagination, theology, tobacco, commitment, hell and the like…All the aforementioned have been discussed with regards to who this man is we know as C.S. Lewis. Each of the previous posts have brilliantly painted the portrait of the man called Jack (by his friends), a man who has arguably had one of the most profound and significant influences on Christianity, and in particular my own studies and faith.<br />
<br />
Like all of us, Lewis wrestled with the question of who he is. At the age of 15 he claimed to be an atheist, even amidst growing up in a church-going family. Through his work, Lewis continued to wrestle with the question of “who am I?” – and it is my belief that Lewis knew each one of us wrestles with this question. The profundity of Lewis’ work is that he understood and embedded the reality that the question of who I am must be answered in light of who I say Jesus is. I can only be true to myself if indeed I know who I am.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9syVcj4MX6aK7TEK1WseXEtyU9FgYOufwhFEyQ5vdvsK9sNf2Dkz5avumloiurtxECUeup-qNpqdFQ09dngOCaDZhk1UD43Js17adoiYcz8lzTRR4eZsYDfMpJ9Sd4BrbQZT3_CzXm21d/s1600/images.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9syVcj4MX6aK7TEK1WseXEtyU9FgYOufwhFEyQ5vdvsK9sNf2Dkz5avumloiurtxECUeup-qNpqdFQ09dngOCaDZhk1UD43Js17adoiYcz8lzTRR4eZsYDfMpJ9Sd4BrbQZT3_CzXm21d/s1600/images.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
Thus, Jesus’ question “Who do you say I am?” (Mat 16.15; Mar 8.29; Lk 9.20) is <b><span style="font-size: large;">the great quenching question.</span></b> It silences all others, for it is itself the answer to everything. Like Lewis, who as a child was angry with God, we all think we have the right to make certain demands of Almighty God. We are quite ready to place God in the dock so as to question Him, to question His ways. We approach Him with many questions, questions with a touch of complaint in them, with a note of self-excuse, with more than a hint of self-satisfaction. Yet, God is ready with His answer: “What do you think about the Christ?”<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>So many refuse to accept the person of Christ in His deity because of His scandalous nature. </b></span> They cannot reply to the great question of who Christ is with “My Lord and my God” (John 20.28). They remain utterly silent not realising that God is here and He is not silent. This Christ who began by appealing to our heart ends by compelling our attention. Instead of giving attention to the scandalous nature of Christ, many desire for Him simply to be safe, but as Lewis wrote in The Chronicles of Narnia, Jesus (Aslan) is not safe, but He is good. Thus, the question remains, “Who do you say I am?” <br />
<br />
Jesus Christ is Lord because He is God. In this vein, Lewis’ point made about the deity of Christ in his classic, <i>Mere Christianity, </i>must be stated:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: “I'm ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don't accept his claim to be God.” That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic—on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg—or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God; or else a madman or something worse. You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon, or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come away with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to." </blockquote>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Christianity is rooted in the act and love of the Trinity</b>. </span>It is a faith rooted in the performance of Christ such that through the Holy Spirit we (humanity) might come to participate in the on-going transformative and redemptive drama of the Godhead. In some sense, it is faith in the absurd. The whole of our faith is focused on the appalling end of Jesus, of the Cross, as having been brought about pro nobis, (for us); Paul even says: for each one of us, thus, for me. <br />
<br />
The foundation of Christianity is scandalous and, as theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar points out, this scandal cannot “be removed by further theoretical discussion but only by praxis. . . . God shows his truth to us through acting, and the Christian (including the anonymous Christian, the Samaritan) likewise shows that he is following in Christ’s footsteps by acting in love towards his fellow men.” <span style="font-size: large;"><b>Faith in Christ is an act that supersedes all others, because as an act that participates in Christ’s drama of salvation, it defines and answers the question of “who I am.” </b></span><br />
<br />
However, in modern times, faith has been weakened in meaning so that some people use it to mean self-confidence. But in the Bible, true faith is confidence in, and surrender to, the Father through the Son and in the Spirit, not to oneself. Lewis wrote that “We must not encourage in ourselves or others any tendency to work up a subjective state which, if we succeeded, we should describe “faith,” with the idea that this will somehow insure the granting of our prayer…The state of mind in which desperate desire working on a strong imagination can manufacture is not faith in the Christian sense. It is a feat of psychological gymnastics.” <br />
<br />
Thanks to giants such as C.S. Lewis we can confidently come to realize that while we are called to live by faith, we must know that we are not left alone in this call, as God is with us and we are with God. We participate in God’s eternal act of love (Christ’s salvific act) through our willingness to step into and live out the scandalous reality of the cross – a reality that transformed a 15 year old Irish atheist into one of the most profoundly influential Christian authors and thinkers of our time. <br />
<br />
For more from Dr. Matt Farlow, check it out his blog <a href="http://lakesidechurch.com/godtalk">http://lakesidechurch.com/godtalk</a> or you can follow him at <a href="https://twitter.com/drmatthewfarlow">https://twitter.com/drmatthewfarlow</a> .<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5554928980868507590.post-82891861682290901802012-10-04T21:48:00.001-07:002012-10-04T21:51:45.052-07:00C.S. Lewis—A man who believed in Purgatory<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%;">Is this
true? Did C.S. Lewis believe in the concept of Purgatory? See for yourself. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Below are Lewis’ words:</span></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiiIR5F875gVX899jutOSq3_x0t3FpEICBFIu8J0zcO-vNdOW2TxZkhngQUycm4gErZq-gxlokEtPKzoSso8Q2Acsd2iAwvNrTaQqI1N7wv8g7Jh6k4JSsjyOt-HC3ZJznfWFdCS6EJHadV/s1600/Purgatory.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiiIR5F875gVX899jutOSq3_x0t3FpEICBFIu8J0zcO-vNdOW2TxZkhngQUycm4gErZq-gxlokEtPKzoSso8Q2Acsd2iAwvNrTaQqI1N7wv8g7Jh6k4JSsjyOt-HC3ZJznfWFdCS6EJHadV/s1600/Purgatory.jpg" /></a><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">“Of course,
I pray for the dead (i.e. the dead in Purgatory). The action is so spontaneous,
so all but inevitable, that only the most compulsive theological case against
it would deter me. And I hardly know how the rest of my prayers would survive
if those for the dead were forbidden. At our age the majority of those we love
best are dead. What sort of intercourse with God could I have if what I love
best with unmentionable to Him?” (Letters to Malcolm: Chiefly on prayer).</span></blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">“How do I
know all her (Joy, Lewis’ deceased wife) anguish is past? I have never believed
before—I thought it immensely improbable—that the most faithful of souls could
leap straight into perfection and peace the moment death has rattled in the
throat.” </span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Again,
referring to Joy (his deceased wife),</span></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">“I know
there are not only tears to be dried but stains to be scoured.” </span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 18px;">And finally....</span></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">“The job
will not be completed in this life; but He means to get us as far as possible
before death.” </span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Therefore, it seems self-evident that Lewis wholeheartedly believed in <i>some concept of Purgatory. <o:p></o:p></i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Now before I
give my thoughts regarding Purgatory, I want to be clear on what Lewis believed
(and didn’t believe) about Purgatory. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Some would
say C.S. Lewis believed in the (recently popularized) <i>sanctification </i>(i.e. cleansing) model of Purgatory, rather than the
classic model of <i>satisfaction</i> (i.e. punishment
for your sins). <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">But if you are like me you are wondering, "What is the <i>sanctification</i>
model of Purgatory?" <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Basically,
it is the idea that Purgatory is necessary <b>to
make</b> <b>the Christian</b> <i>fully or completely sanctified </i>before
you enter Heaven. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Lewis
explains,</span></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">“Our souls
demand Purgatory, don’t they? Would it not break the heart if God said to us,
“It is true, my son, that your breath smells and your rags drip with mud and
slime, but we are charitable here and no one will upbraid you with these
things, nor draw away from you. Enter into joy”? Should we not reply, “With
submission, sir, and if there is no objection, I’d rather be cleansed first.”
“It may hurt, you know”—even so, sir.”</span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Again, this
is fascinating. Lewis believes that Christians will <i>actually demand to be placed in Purgatory</i>. The beauty and purity of
Heaven will still be too much for their sinful disposition, so the Christian must be purged
so that they can reside in their eternal home. But let us not overlook that (according
to Lewis) God seems to be willing to complete the process of Sanctification <i>unilaterally</i>, which continues to be the theological position
of most Protestants. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">So, is
Lewis’ correct? Should Protestants reexamine this doctrine, especially since
most of us revere the legendary Oxford Don for his literature and his
apologetics? <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Here is my
answer in four distinct arguments: <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><b>#1—There is
not one explicit (or implicit) verse advocating the concept of purgatory. </b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Those who
oppose this doctrine often argue this point: <i><u>There is no biblical evidence</u></i>. And if there is no biblical
evidence, then there is no theological evidence. What else do we base our
theology on? <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><b>#2—It cannot
be reconciled with justification by faith alone. </b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfp65rqv5WImMOUOSnK-wG6p5BaDlQdvxpkFh9foYCPDxhCQohxsR4c0sBA3sahlWUaw0ias-hQ2xOWJrsnPQA0dCPdAcgPS15gK0epPzVFl8q6YoJz_nlKpklBDy96ucXcx4leavAYJLT/s1600/Purgatory2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgfp65rqv5WImMOUOSnK-wG6p5BaDlQdvxpkFh9foYCPDxhCQohxsR4c0sBA3sahlWUaw0ias-hQ2xOWJrsnPQA0dCPdAcgPS15gK0epPzVFl8q6YoJz_nlKpklBDy96ucXcx4leavAYJLT/s1600/Purgatory2.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">This was the
main objection by the Reformers. The concept of Purgatory (i.e. the
satisfaction model) requires justification by works. In other words, it is your
works that releases you from Purgatory. It is your works that satisfies the
wrath of God. It is your works that reconcile you to God. And finally, it is
your works that grant you entrance into Heaven. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: small;">The truth: </span><span style="font-size: large;"><i><b>The
doctrine of Purgatory distorts the gospel of Jesus Christ, therefore, it is heresy.
</b></i><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><b>#3—Scripture
seems to teach immediate placement of individuals in Heaven (and maybe in Hell).
</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">What else
can we conclude from the interaction of Jesus and the thief on the cross? <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-language: HE;">Luke 23:42</span></b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-bidi-language: HE;"> And he said, "Jesus, remember me when you come into
your kingdom." <sup>43</sup> And he said to him, "Truly, I say to
you, <b><u>today you will be with me in
Paradise."</u></b></span><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">It seems
clear that Jesus and the thief went <i>immediately
into Heaven.</i> <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Someone may
ask, “Is it possible Purgatory is Paradise?” I mean, didn’t C.S. Lewis believe
in something like that? <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Yes, he did.
<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Notice the
words of Lewis’ guide in <i>The Great
Divorce</i>:</span></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">“It depends
on the way you are using the words. If they leave that grey town (i.e. Hell) behind
it will not have been Hell. To any that leaves it, it is Purgatory. And perhaps
you had better not call this country Heaven. Not Deep Heaven, you understand.
You can call it the Valley of the Shadow of Life.”</span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Interesting,
isn’t it? <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Ok, let us
reason together for a moment. Now if there is any legitimacy in the
sanctification model of Purgatory, isn’t the thief on the Cross the example <i>Par Excellence</i>? In other words, if
anyone needed the “sanctifying work of Purgatory”, it is the thief on the
cross, because he had no time to grow in sanctification or prepare himself for
the beauties of Heaven. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">So it seems
reasonable to me that if you add the<b><i> conversion of the thief </i></b>with the<b><i>
finality of Hebrews 9:27</i></b>, the reader must conclude that when you walk
through death’s doors, there is no opportunity for purging, learning or
changing your mind. All sales are final. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><b>#4—The Parable of the Laborers in the Vineyard</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 18px;">I believe this is main scriptural evidence against the <i>sanctification</i> model of Purgatory. </span></div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-language: HE;">Matthew 20:1-16</span></b><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-language: HE;"> "For the kingdom of heaven is like a master of a
house who went out early in the morning to hire laborers for his vineyard. <sup>2</sup>
After agreeing with the laborers for a denarius a day, he sent them into his
vineyard. <sup>3</sup> And going out about the third hour he saw others
standing idle in the marketplace, <sup>4</sup> and to them he said, 'You go
into the vineyard too, and whatever is right I will give you.' <sup>5</sup> So
they went. Going out again about the sixth hour and the ninth hour, he did the
same. <sup>6</sup> And about the eleventh hour he went out and found others
standing. And he said to them, 'Why do you stand here idle all day?' <sup>7</sup>
They said to him, 'Because no one has hired us.' He said to them, 'You go into
the vineyard too.' <sup>8</sup> And when evening came, the owner of the
vineyard said to his foreman, 'Call the laborers and pay them their wages,
beginning with the last, up to the first.' <sup>9</sup> And when those hired
about the eleventh hour came, each of them received a denarius. <sup>10</sup>
Now when those hired first came, they thought they would receive more, but each
of them also received a denarius. <sup>11</sup> And on receiving it they
grumbled at the master of the house, <sup>12</sup> saying, 'These last worked
only one hour, and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of
the day and the scorching heat.' <sup>13</sup> But he replied to one of them,
'Friend, I am doing you no wrong. Did you not agree with me for a denarius? <sup>14</sup>
Take what belongs to you and go. I choose to give to this last worker as I give
to you. <sup>15</sup> Am I not allowed to do what I choose with what belongs to
me? Or do you begrudge my generosity?' <sup>16</sup> So the last will be first,
and the first last."</span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">So now if we
use this parable as the grid for understanding Jesus’ words to the thief on the
cross, then this guy was paid for WORKING ONE HOUR. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">Do we have the right to
condemn God for being gracious to the thief? <u>Let us remember that God does not
have to show His favor to anyone. </u></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Apparently, it brought God glory to save a
wretched sinner just moments before his death. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">Someone
might ask, “Was it legitimate?” or “Was it a <i>foxhole</i> conversion?” Well, we have two options at this point.
Either Jesus knew his heart or He didn’t. Oh….and if your answer if Jesus
didn’t know, then He lied to the thief. Absurd! <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><b>Conclusion</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 12.0pt; line-height: 115%;">C.S. Lewis
is one of the greatest storytellers and apologists ever to walk the face of the
earth. Christians should not hesitate to read his works over and over again. But
was he right about Purgatory? Nope. Dead wrong…..no pun intended. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Clint Lettermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01052652624821285235noreply@blogger.com17