Skip to main content

George Whitefield—A man bound to Christ, not a denomination

Throughout the next few weeks, this blog will examine certain “snapshots” of George Whitefield, which I hope will bring a deeper appreciation for this servant and a greater love for the God whom he gave his life to.

Here is a snapshot of a unique meeting Whitefield had during his life:
“Whitefield met with the Associate Presbytery as planned. He spoke of them as “A set of grave venerable men”. They immediately began to present their doctrine of church government and the Solemn League and Covenant, but he told them they might save themselves the trouble, for he had no scruples on the subject. He asked them what they would have him do, and the answer was that he was to preach only for them till he had further light. He asked why only for them. To which Ralph Erskine replied that “they were the Lord’s people.” He stated that he was “determined to go out into the highways and hedges; and that if the Pope himself would lend him his pulpit, he would gladly “proclaim the righteousness of Christ therein”. (p. 105)
Some context is probably needed to understand what is going on. Whitefield journeyed to Scotland to evangelize and observe the work being done there. The Erskine brothers (Ralph and Ebenezer) were influential pastors and ardent Presbyterians. They believed strongly that their method of church government was correct and apparently believed that Presbyterians (and only Presbyterians) were “the Lord’s people”. In the above paragraph, we see clearly Whitefield’s indifference towards “denominationalism”.
Yet in reading about Whitefield, we must remember that he himself never left the Church of England. Even more surprising was his unwaveringly loyalty to the mother church, since they themselves were the first (of many) to try to limit his preaching ministry.

A couple questions should be asked at this point: What did Whitefield think about denominations? How should we think about denominations?

Whitefield did not view denominationalism as a test of Christian fellowship.  

Some would call Whitefield an iterant preacher and that classification is probably appropriate. He understood that his calling was to preach the gospel to everyone, without partiality, which included Baptists, Presbyterians, independents, etc. Furthermore, the blessing of God on his ministry mandated that he preach in the open air (since very few churches could accommodate the crowds).  Obviously, this meant that people from all denominations were coming to listen to this increasingly popular preacher.
I think the issue was very basic for Whitefield. He believed that Christians are here to proclaim the gospel and live under the Lordship of Jesus Christ. Denominations are wonderful instruments that can promote better accountability, effectiveness and clarity in the areas of doctrine, discipleship, training and global missions. Yet Whitefield also experienced the glaring weakness of denominationalism, which is the temptation to elevate what is secondary to a place of primacy.
People today have a growing distrust of church denominations. The reasons are many, but I would venture to say that their distrust stems from the focus (of many churches) on petty issues or their disdain for a “black sheep” church that gets more notoriety (i.e. Westboro Baptist Church). This does not mean that denominations are not helpful or even valuable. The pages of church history are filled with stories of what they have done for the name of Christ. Yet it seems that when denominations begin to care more about their distinctives, policies, or by-laws rather than the gospel and the core doctrines of the Christian faith, then the effectiveness of their denomination begins to wane.
I grew up in a GARB church (General Association of Regular Baptists) and came to appreciate their focus on believer’s baptism, the separation of church and state and their view on eschatology (Pre-tribulational and pre-millennial). Yet their position on church government (i.e. deacon-led and congregational rule) does not reflect (in my opinion) the biblical data, which clearly teaches that local churches should be led by a plurality of elders.
Yet, in my assessment, the subject of church government is a secondary issue and therefore, should not be a test of fellowship with my brothers in Christ, who happen to attend a Baptist church. Christians that separate because of these “secondary” issues are immature in the faith and are unknowingly servants of Satan (Mark 8:33). We should be ashamed that many people are turned off by Christians, not because of our persistent presentation of the gospel, but because they don’t see a people committed to reconciliation, peace and love.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C.S. Lewis—A man who smoked and drank alcohol

One of the most engaging seminars on C.S. Lewis was done by Dr. Knox Chamblin (who died earlier this year) at Reformed Theological Seminary. This series explored primarily Lewis’ life, his works and his theology. In one of the earlier seminars, Dr. Chamblin shared this historic interaction between the well-known fundamentalist Dr. Bob Jones Jr. and C.S. Lewis. Asked afterwards for an assessment regarding the Oxford Don, Dr. Jones stated, “That man smokes a pipe….and that man drinks liquor….but I do believe he is a Christian!” This quote leads us into the central thesis of this blog post, “What is the Christian’s position regarding alcohol and tobacco?” I admit grappling with this issue is nothing new in the blogosphere or in pockets of evangelicalism.  Furthermore, I will gladly confess that this blog post will not bring anything original to this provocative topic. Being a Christian is not about abstaining from alcohol or tobacco. I used to judge the indiv...

George Whitefield—A man who (knowingly) married an unattractive woman

Throughout the next few weeks, this blog will examine certain “snapshots” of George Whitefield, which I hope will bring a deeper appreciation for this servant and a greater love for the God whom he gave his life to. Here is a quote from Whitefield: “I married one who was a widow, of about 36 years of age….neither rich in fortune nor beautiful as to her person , but, I believe a true child of God, and would not, I think, attempt to hinder me in his work for the world.” (p.113) If the words of Whitefield come as a shock to you, then the events leading up to the marriage will absolutely astonish you. Whitefield himself never thought of himself as a lifetime bachelor. He assumed that God had someone special for him. Yet he would have never imagined that his friendship with the great Howell Harris would lead him to his wife. Who is Howell Harris? History describes him as fearless, dynamic, tireless and “a man’s man”. From his conversion, this school teacher began to preach the ...

Jonathan Edwards—A man who viewed the doctrine of election as “sweet”

This title is likely to “grate” on some of you, especially for those who are still unconvinced of the “sweetness” of this doctrine. But before you stop reading, please read Edwards’ words below: “From my childhood up, my mind had been full of objections against the doctrine of God’s sovereignty in choosing whom he would to eternal life, and rejecting whom He pleased; leaving them eternally to perish, and be everlastingly tormented in Hell. It used to appear like a horrible doctrine to me. But I have often, since that first conviction, had quite another kind of sense of God’s sovereignty than I had then. I have often since had not only a conviction, but a delightful conviction. The doctrine has very often appeared exceedingly pleasant, bright and sweet. Absolute sovereignty is what I love to ascribe to God. But my conviction was not so.” The journey of Edwards, in regards to the doctrine of election, may surprise some. For many, he is viewed simply as the man who preached the l...