The subtitle reveals the simple premise of the book: 15
tectonic shifts that transform churches, communities and the world. As
expected, each chapter deals with one of the fifteen tectonic shifts. What are
these tectonic shifts? In a word, these shifts interact with the concept of mission, missional living or the more technical term, missiology. It is the belief of the authors that most churches are
unaware of these shifts and therefore, are less effective in reaching the world
for Christ. So this book boldly seeks to inform a generation of church leaders through
the experimental lens of Granger Community Church (a megachurch in Northern
Indiana where the author, Rob Wegner, is one of the lead pastors).
It is not in the scope of this review to critically interact
with each tectonic shift, but extensive comments on a few key shifts are
necessary.
Let’s begin with the Shift #1: Saved souls to Saved
wholes. The authors contend that many churches preach an incomplete gospel or
maybe more specifically, only part of the grand story of salvation. These churches
tend to focus on the life insurance aspect of the gospel (i.e. saved souls),
rather than the salvific blessings which are intended for this life and the
next (i.e. saved wholes). According to the authors, the sad result has been a response that is decisional
and private, rather than transformational and public. In other words, what is
often missing in the “saved souls” version is the emphasis on Lordship.
To the majority of the above paragraph, I say, “Amen”. Furthermore,
I appreciate the authors beginning with the gospel. I agree with the statement found
on page 40, “Every other missional move is contingent upon getting this one
right”.
Yet I am still slightly uncomfortable with the distinction of
“saved souls” to “saved wholes”. Scripturally, there is no theological distinction
in justification between soul and whole. Justification by faith alone assumes
trust, which assumes Lordship. When the soul
is regenerated, the whole is also
regenerated.
So though I like that the move is “catchy”, let us not become
weary in pursuing theological “precision” as well.
My favorite chapter is Shift #2, From Missions to Mission. Though I am personally familiar with this
shift, the basic graph on p. 49 says it all. The graph places the ministry of “missions”
alongside arts, children, small groups, youth, etc. The problem? Missions is
seen as a specialized category of ministry, rather than “THE MISSION” given to
every Christian. In my opinion, this chapter alone is worth the price of the book.
Now this does not mean I embrace everything in chapter two.
The formula espoused by the authors: Local
church on mission + People of God on mission = Apostolic movement is again catchy, but invoking the word “apostolic”
for anything other than the direct ministry of the 12 original apostles is unwise
and hermeneutically cavalier. Post 1st century Christians are called
disciples, followers and slaves of Jesus Christ, but never His apostles.
Another helpful element is that this book not only explains
the “shifts” themselves, but also how to implement these movements into the life
of the local church. The clearest example of this is found in chapter 7, From
Transactional to Transformational Partnerships. The authors explain,
“The old model sent out organizations to do the work of mission, leaving the local church behind to provide money. The local church was involved, but not directly” (p. 168).
So the issue the authors wrestle with is, “How do we get
local churches involved directly and still use these essential partnerships?”
With the use of illustrations, graphs and the experimental history
of Granger, the reader is given a roadmap to build local church involvement and partnership,
which functions as a wonderful resource, especially for those leaders in established
churches.
Criticism
Other than the occasional examples of theological ambiguity,
my only other criticism is this: 15 missional moves was too much. I think the
maxim “Less is more” applies here. Limiting and then expanding 5-7 moves would
have been more useful in my opinion.
Conclusion
Would I recommend this book? Yes, but only to mature pastor
or church leader. The authors are unabashedly seeker-driven (attractional, in
their words) and their philosophy is woven through this book. Yet there are also
profound insights regarding missiology that if absorbed correctly could benefit
both the church leader and the church itself.
Disclosure of Material Connection: I received this book free
from Cross Focused Reviews as part of their Blogger Review Program. I was not
required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own.
I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission's 16 CFR,
Part 255: "Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in
Advertising."
Good comments on the book... I am familiar with Granger... agree that maybe 15 axioms is a bit much, but who knows...? LOL
ReplyDeleteClint,
ReplyDeleteThanks for being a part of the Missional Moves blog tour. I appreciated the clarity and precision you used to differentiate between what you agreed with and that which gave you cause for concern.
Shaun Tabatt
Cross Focused Reviews
Clint! Thank you so much for taking the time to review Missional Moves. Would it make you laugh to know that when Rob and i finished our first draft of the book, we actually had 225,000 words? The end product was just a little under 70,000 and we felt like we had to amputate precious limbs or digits in the cutting process to make that marker. A lot of that is why we have such a significant amount of supplemental content on Missionalmoves.com, including free eBooks and other downloads. We actually considered writing everything as three separate books, but were afraid if people stalled out on the theological section that they wouldn't continue to the more pragmatic second and third. Anyway, thank you again for your time and consideration. We are, as you say, unabashedly seeker-driven, but hopefully at the same time in Missional Moves demonstrated our belief that "the most effective attractional churches will be well equipped to be missional as well" (i.e. the Genius of the AND). At least, we here at GCC have endeavored to be such. Thanks again! - jack magruder
ReplyDelete