Dr. John D. Currid is Professor of Old Testament at Reformed
Theological Seminary in Charlotte, North Carolina. He has a PhD in archaeology
and has authored several commentaries (e.g. The Pentateuch, Habakkuk). In his
introduction, Dr. Currid breaks up the book of Ruth into five sections: Part
one—Setting the scene (1:1-5), Part two—Naomi and her Moabite daughter-in-laws
(1:6-22), Part three—In the fields of Bethlehem (2:1-23), Part four—The scene
at the Threshing Floor (3:1-18) and Part five—Redemption (4:1-22). These
sections encompass the majority of the commentaries’ brief 136 pages. Also, the
introduction contains the author’s valuable thesis statement, “Thus the book is
serving a greater purpose than merely being a moral story of human goodness: it points to the future reality of the
coming King”.
I would label Professor Currid’s commentary somewhere
between an exegetical commentary and a devotional one. To be clear, both
elements are beautifully integrated throughout. The exegetical component is not
only seen in the author’s commitment to the literary / historical context but
also in his detailed explanation of key words and phrases of each verse. As to
the devotional feature, Currid incorporates in each chapter the orthopraxical Points to Ponder, which helps the reader
be not just ‘a hearer of the Word, but also a doer’ (James 1:22).
For those readers who love Reformation history, you are in for a
treat. Every chapter is woven with either Puritan anecdotes or quotes from the
spiritual giants of previous times. Admittedly, Dr. Currid’s affection for the
past may not connect the young or modern reader, but what else would you expect
from a professor who received his doctorate in archeology, the study of old stuff?
One of the most important concepts of the book of Ruth is
the goel (Heb.) which means literally,
kinsman-redeemer. Here Dr. Currid is
at his literary best. His clear, engaging exegesis of this Israelite societal provision
is eye-opening. In just three pages, the author describes the four duties of
the goel, which all revolve around
the concept of redemption. Though most readers will automatically perceive the link
to the coming Messiah, Currid leaves no room for blindness and states, “Jesus
claims (in Luke 4) to be the one who will bring release and liberty to His
people; He is the goel for the
believer” (p. 92).
Criticism
If you were to ask any pastor or scholar, “What is the most
provocative part of Ruth?”, the answer is always, “The scene of the threshing floor, of course!” This scene is the
apex, the crescendo of the story. Ruth, by the advice of Naomi (her
mother-in-law), dolls herself up and sneaks into the bed of Boaz and lies down
at his feet. Provocative, indeed!
Dr. Currid argues strongly that not only was this act culturally
appropriate, but there was no sexual activity between Ruth and Boaz.
He does admit that the term “uncover” is often used to describe sexual activity
in the OT, but the connection to Boaz’s feet speaks to redemption, not sexual
conduct. He states on page 104, Ruth ‘is asking that Boaz would be willing to
take her under his redemptive wings to protect her……the placing of the blanket
over her is symbolic of that protection and security’. Though I agree with the
author’s conclusion, I think this issue required direct interaction with those
views critical of his, of which he did not do.
Finally, I continue to be unsettled with the need for Ruth’s
nightly encounter with Boaz. Dr. Currid gives no cultural precedence for such an
interaction and his application of Ezekiel 16, though original to this
reviewer, is not convincing. I am left wondering if Naomi’s advice reveals
impatience, rather than godly discretion.
Conclusion
In my opinion, this resource is a wonderful addition to the
short list of Ruthian commentaries. Currid’s work is brief, readable and from
the reformed tradition (though it doesn’t feel that way). If you are just
starting to build your library, I would start with this work.
Disclosure of Material Connection: I received this book free from Cross Focused Reviews as part of their Blogger Review Program. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission's 16 CFR, Part 255: "Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.
Great review Clint! Thanks for being a part of the blog tour.
ReplyDeleteShaun Tabatt
Cross Focused Reviews